2000
DOI: 10.1080/00905990050002425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Identity, Confessionalism, and Nationalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lacking religious grounds, elites attempted to build national identity out of a sense of common language, but this effort was limited by the obvious reality that Albanians spoke two distinct languages. In Mentzel's (2000, p. 251) own words:…”
Section: Embracing Conventional Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lacking religious grounds, elites attempted to build national identity out of a sense of common language, but this effort was limited by the obvious reality that Albanians spoke two distinct languages. In Mentzel's (2000, p. 251) own words:…”
Section: Embracing Conventional Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An historian, Peter Mentzel (2000) utilizes the concept of a kinship bonding mechanism to explore variation in the origins of nationalist loyalties and viable nation-states in the Balkans, especially as they developed under the rule of the Ottoman Empire. To begin, he notes that nationalism, the politically active expression of ethnic identity, resulted in more effective and stable nation-states in Croatia, Serbia, Greece, and Bulgaria than in the territories largely populated by Albanians.…”
Section: Embracing Conventional Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the dissolution of former Yugoslavia, nationalism and ethnic conflict emerged as the hegemonic paradigms to analyse almost all processes of change unfolding across the Balkans. In this context, the revival of Islam is usually read through collective categories of national "belonging" and "Othering", which insist on clear criteria for inclusion and exclusion between and within specific political units (see, e.g., Mentzel 2000). These categorical terms of inter-communal belonging are now found in the media, political debates and international community's projects, thus, shaping an overarching and self-perpetuating line of discourse (Henig and Bielenin-Lenczowska 2013, 2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%