2012
DOI: 10.1364/boe.3.001399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Feature Issue on Phantoms for the Performance Evaluation and Validation of Optical Medical Imaging Devices

Abstract: The editors introduce the Biomedical Optics Express feature issue on “Phantoms for the Performance Evaluation and Validation of Optical Medical Imaging Devices.” This topic was the focus of a technical workshop that was held on November 7–8, 2011, in Washington, D.C. The feature issue includes 13 contributions from workshop attendees.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since biological tissue is a turbid medium, optical phantom must have scattering and absorbing components [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since biological tissue is a turbid medium, optical phantom must have scattering and absorbing components [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such optical measurement systems for biomedical applications rely on tissue-equivalent phantoms for testing system design and comparing di®erent measurement methods. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] Use of real human tissues is impractical since the optical properties of such samples change in various atmospheric conditions (i.e., humidity, temperature) and rapidly degrade over time, thus they are unusable as standards with known and stable properties. Therefore, optical properties of phantoms (scattering coe±cient s , absorption coe±cient a , scattering anisotropy factor g, refractive index n, and thickness L) should be properly tuned to correspond to that of tissues they mimic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 A key requirement for such applications to grow and gain a more widespread clinical or industrial acceptance is to achieve a high grade of reliability, reproducibility, accuracy in quantification, and comparability of clinical results. 17 There is a compelling need to nurture the culture of quality assessment and quantitative grading of instruments in diffuse optics to support the parallel development of new instruments/techniques and applications on a stringent basis. [18][19][20] The main path to reach these goals is the adoption of protocols for performance assessment to measure and characterize the system behavior.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different solutions for the construction of inhomogeneous phantoms were proposed, as shown in the review papers 25,26 and in a recent special issue of Biomedical Optics Express, 17 adopting liquid-liquid, 27 liquid-solid, [28][29][30] and solid-solid structures, [31][32][33][34] each of them with different advantages and criticalities. To comply with the requirements (1), (2), and (4) we opted for a solid-solid approach, obviously more practical than liquid-liquid or mixed approaches.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%