2001
DOI: 10.1080/00420980123505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction : Fear and the City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
51
0
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(6 reference statements)
1
51
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Glaeser and Sacerdote (1996), Gibbons (2004), Bannister and Fyfe (2001). The pattern of higher crime rates in agglomerations can also be found in the ESS.…”
Section: Regional Perception Of Safety and Life Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Glaeser and Sacerdote (1996), Gibbons (2004), Bannister and Fyfe (2001). The pattern of higher crime rates in agglomerations can also be found in the ESS.…”
Section: Regional Perception Of Safety and Life Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The generic effectiveness of safety planning measures can therefore be questioned and should always be empirically tested and locally fine-tuned (Pain and Townshend, 2002). It is also important to notice that 'fear discourses' themselves create fear by defining and maintaining boundaries between deviance and normality, order and disorder -what and who should be afraid of and excluded from the places (Bannister and Fyfe, 2001;England and Simon, 2010). To break the vicious cycle of fear that often results from increased public awareness of safety issues, careful, situational strategies need to be complemented with wider strategies -for example -reducing the motivation to commit crime and incivilities through influencing social and economic development (Carmona et al 2003, p. 120).…”
Section: Background Neighborhood Safety Planning Strategies In Varioumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Les politiques de régénération urbaine intègrent de façon croissante des dispositifs de sécurisa-tion des espaces (Bannister et Fyfe, 2001 ;Coleman et Sim, 2000), mettant en avant la nécessité du contrôle de populations et la défi nition d'un ordre social légitime (Coleman et al, 2005). La sécurisation des espaces se cale également sur les nouvelles modalités de régulation urbaine, basées sur des partenariats publics/privés, notamment via les Business Improvement Districts (Steel et Symes, 2005) ou les agences publiques/privées de régénération urbaine, permettant une « corporatisation of crime control » (Coleman et al, 2005).…”
Section: Patrimoine Et Sécurisation Des Espacesunclassified