2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Embracing Non-Human Nature in World Politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This SI thus makes a significant contribution to filling a knowledge gap in the field's engagement with the Anthropocene and advancing the research agenda of 'post-anthropocentric IR'. 13 The SI also seeks to establish a conversation between IR and Critical Animal Studies (CAS). Similar to the post-anthropocentric perspective, CAS starts from a radical critique of anthropocentrism and diagnoses a deep ecological crisis of the planet which encompasses extreme environmental threats and is most evident in the vast dimensions of species extinction and the dramatic intensification of animal slaughter and exploitation.…”
Section: The Invisibility Of Animals In Irmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This SI thus makes a significant contribution to filling a knowledge gap in the field's engagement with the Anthropocene and advancing the research agenda of 'post-anthropocentric IR'. 13 The SI also seeks to establish a conversation between IR and Critical Animal Studies (CAS). Similar to the post-anthropocentric perspective, CAS starts from a radical critique of anthropocentrism and diagnoses a deep ecological crisis of the planet which encompasses extreme environmental threats and is most evident in the vast dimensions of species extinction and the dramatic intensification of animal slaughter and exploitation.…”
Section: The Invisibility Of Animals In Irmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that human prosperity, animal well-being and planetary health are strongly interwoven, inter-species relations have historically been neglected in the practices of international organisations (IOs), like the UN, and in International Relations (IR) scholarship. There is now a growing body of literature criticising IR anthropocentrism, [8][9][10] the dualistic understanding of humans and nature, 11 and the failure to acknowledge the interrelatedness between world politics and non-human nature. 12 This leads to suggestions that we need to profoundly rethink IR, 13 and develop a posthuman approach in a world of multiple complexities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is now a growing body of literature criticising IR anthropocentrism, [8][9][10] the dualistic understanding of humans and nature, 11 and the failure to acknowledge the interrelatedness between world politics and non-human nature. 12 This leads to suggestions that we need to profoundly rethink IR, 13 and develop a posthuman approach in a world of multiple complexities. 14 Fougner 15 raises the 'animal question', which has historically been neglected in IR, despite the fact that animals are present in many aspects of IR human-animal relations and IR affects the lives of animals, for example in relation to environmental destruction, zoonoses or trade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%