The Palgrave Handbook of the Public Servant 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03008-7_117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Civil servants also recognised the tensions within the DUP team, and departmental division along party lines. This required civil servants to juggle independent policy advice with a ‘higher level of real politics’ than civil servants were at ease with (Rouse and O’Connor, 2020: 11), increasingly requiring ‘active conflict management roles’ in a politicised environment (Rouse and O’Connor, 2020: 13). The closeness of the one-to-one minister–SpAd relationship gives SpAds more access, often positioning them – informally at least – ‘over’ civil servants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Civil servants also recognised the tensions within the DUP team, and departmental division along party lines. This required civil servants to juggle independent policy advice with a ‘higher level of real politics’ than civil servants were at ease with (Rouse and O’Connor, 2020: 11), increasingly requiring ‘active conflict management roles’ in a politicised environment (Rouse and O’Connor, 2020: 13). The closeness of the one-to-one minister–SpAd relationship gives SpAds more access, often positioning them – informally at least – ‘over’ civil servants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such the organisational actions (or inactions) whereby the RHI became a crisis needs to be understood within the post-conflict settlement context (Helms and Oliver, 2015). As well as securing consensus between political actors, the politician–official relationship initially ‘bore the hallmarks of a legacy of distrust and suspicion’ (Rouse and O’Connor, 2020: 7). As power sharing became embedded this evolved into officials playing active roles in day-to-day management (O’Connor, 2012) while also being side-lined and blamed for failings by politically partisan ministers and SpAds (Carmichael and Osborne, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This has important implications with respect to accountability, not just in relation to the oversight provided by the elected politicians over the public service, but also, and perhaps more importantly, in terms of how accountability is shared—if that is even possible—when public leadership is distributed amongst a multiplicity of actors both within and outside of government. As Thomas (2009, pp. 244–245) noted, “Leadership involves responsibility, which leads to accountability.” As leadership becomes more “dispersed and more networked in character,” it makes sense that “accountability will become complicated and blurred.” The model also incorporates avenues for the wide range of in-depth research on politics and administration that has been developed.…”
Section: A Proposed Multilateral Actor Model For Analyzing Public Lea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the technical support units of universities, the introduction of NPM-based human resources approaches faced resistance from the leadership, as these reforms overlooked the deeply political culture of traditional Chilean universities, where leaders are often appointed based on political rather than academic criteria (Salazar et al, 2022). Similarly, the difficulties developing countries encounter when implementing NPM have been previously described, as the approach was initially designed for advanced capitalist nations (Haque, 2020).…”
Section: Higher Education Npm and Civil Service Careersmentioning
confidence: 99%