2020
DOI: 10.1177/1350508420973307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Critically interrogating inclusion in organisations

Abstract: This Special Issue seeks to begin to map out the key issues and contours of the emerging stream of literature on critical studies of inclusion in organisations. We aim to generate and develop further debates on critically theorising the concept, rhetoric and practices of inclusion, how inclusion manifests in different organisational contexts, how it works for different social groups, and how it continues to be implicated and interwoven with the logic of exclusion and inequality in contemporary organisations. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
(144 reference statements)
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, through proposing the ‘variety’ perspective as a starting point, it highlights the importance of organisational efforts to increase variety as a prerequisite for achieving inclusion. Research has criticised organisational inclusion practices that produce a tokenistic representation of members of minority groups (Adamson et al., 2021) by focussing merely on increasing the number of representatives of minority groups in an organisation without acknowledging the value that a variety of backgrounds and perspectives bring to the organisation. A recent large‐scale review of the consequences of tokenism shows that ‘being a token is for the most part, a negative experience that carries with it a host of adverse consequences’ (Watkins et al, 2019, p. 360).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, through proposing the ‘variety’ perspective as a starting point, it highlights the importance of organisational efforts to increase variety as a prerequisite for achieving inclusion. Research has criticised organisational inclusion practices that produce a tokenistic representation of members of minority groups (Adamson et al., 2021) by focussing merely on increasing the number of representatives of minority groups in an organisation without acknowledging the value that a variety of backgrounds and perspectives bring to the organisation. A recent large‐scale review of the consequences of tokenism shows that ‘being a token is for the most part, a negative experience that carries with it a host of adverse consequences’ (Watkins et al, 2019, p. 360).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper began by recognizing that business schools and management educators need to take the issue of inclusion more seriously (Adamson et al, 2020;Stewart et al, 2008), particularly in the light of the #metoo and Black Lives Matter movements (Bell et al, 2019;Bell et al, 2021;Chowdhury, 2021;Dar et al, 2021;Vachhani & Pullen, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas organisational socialisation scholarship traditionally seeks to identify factors that facilitate newcomers' progress on their journey of becoming organisational insiders (Bauer et al, 2007; Wanberg & Choi, 2012), we approach this topic from a more critical angle by examining factors that complicate the refugees' socialisation and development. By studying potentially negative consequences of management practices for workers and giving voice to societally marginalised people, we position our study in the pragmatically critical management scholarship in the sense of Fournier and Grey (2000) as well as a recent research stream of critical studies on organisational inclusion (Adamson et al, 2021). Thereby, in keeping with Berger & Luckmann (1966), we understand organisational socialisation as a socially constructed phenomenon.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%