2006
DOI: 10.1080/13533310500424603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Criteria for evaluating post-conflict reconstruction and security sector reform in peace support operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
31
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…To do so, they start with three main hypotheses on issues of resources, coordination, and local ownership (Brozka 2006). Their conclusions, based on six case studies, are, however, more limited and attempt to list the factors that influence the outcome of SSR in postconflict settings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To do so, they start with three main hypotheses on issues of resources, coordination, and local ownership (Brozka 2006). Their conclusions, based on six case studies, are, however, more limited and attempt to list the factors that influence the outcome of SSR in postconflict settings.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The result would be competing national agendas, unclear division of labor, and 2 I.O. Busterud budgetary problems (Brzoska 2006, Dursun-Ozkanca 2010. That being the case, sufficient investment from the international actors, as well as donor coordination, would both appear to be important criteria to a successful SSR approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As Broszka points out, SSR may be 'sound in theory but problematic in practice'. 14 This reflects a broader approach to state building which has guided the response of the international community to the phenomenon of failed states. There is a strong link between SSR and state building as a global project.…”
Section: Security Development and Liberal State Buildingmentioning
confidence: 99%