2002
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9752.00279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction: Bildung and the idea of a liberal education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The conveying of specific competencies (cf. first-mentioned function above) is the purpose of institutions for general education since they are oriented towards superordinate educational goals rather than the pursuit of concrete changes in behavior [28][29][30]. In the context of the last-mentioned function of -conveying competencies for the implementation of concrete goals of sustainable development‖, educational institutions thus contribute pre-eminently to the attaining of specified goals of sustainable development by enabling their learners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The conveying of specific competencies (cf. first-mentioned function above) is the purpose of institutions for general education since they are oriented towards superordinate educational goals rather than the pursuit of concrete changes in behavior [28][29][30]. In the context of the last-mentioned function of -conveying competencies for the implementation of concrete goals of sustainable development‖, educational institutions thus contribute pre-eminently to the attaining of specified goals of sustainable development by enabling their learners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational offers must thus be aligned with such specified goals of sustainable development (and the fields of action they entail) as they are recorded for example in Agenda 21, in national strategies, in the United Nations Millennium Development Goals or in similar documents. However, such an alignment of the desired competencies cannot be reconciled with currently accepted notions of general education [28][29][30], according to which education is not considered to be instrumental, after all [31]. Therefore, this function of education in the context of sustainable development is aimed only at educational institutions, which, besides a general educational mandate also have a vocational one [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, the philosophy of education course was by far the 'most practical' and consequential part of my teacher training. The course was an introduction to formalised and articulated liberal education; something that was a much more commonplace experience for Europeans with their long and entrenched Bildung tradition (Lövlie and Standish 2002;Westbury et al 2000).…”
Section: From Philosophy Of Education To Philosophy Of Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biesta 2006;Horlacher 2004;Lieberkind and Bergstedt 2005;Masschelein and Ricken 2003;Rise 2010;Schneider 2012;Sünker 2006;Thompson 2005;Wahlström 2010). The investigations on Bildung in the research literature analyse the concept according to Løvlie and Standish (2003) in relation to three axes: cultivation and nature, private and public, and self-education and the cultivation of society. According to Masschelein and Ricken (2003), there are two main traditions: one tradition sees Bildung as a sort of canon indicating the cultural content of education; the other tradition emphasizes a specific kind of self-experience and self-development summarized in the phrase Sich-Bilden or ''self-education''.…”
Section: Bildung In Higher Education and The Relevance Of Kierkegaardmentioning
confidence: 99%