2010
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3968
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction and snapshot review: Relating infectious disease transmission models to data

Abstract: Disease transmission models are becoming increasingly important both to public health policy makers and to scientists across many disciplines. We review some of the key aspects of how and why such models are related to data from infectious disease outbreaks, and identify a number of future challenges in the field.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Case report data such as time series of disease incidence are often incomplete or subject to severe biases like underreporting. Moreover, disease dynamics are generally only partially observed in that the exact times at which infection and recovery events occur are rarely, if ever, directly observed [1], [2], [3]. Researchers have therefore turned to the large amounts of molecular sequence data becoming available when case report data are insufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Case report data such as time series of disease incidence are often incomplete or subject to severe biases like underreporting. Moreover, disease dynamics are generally only partially observed in that the exact times at which infection and recovery events occur are rarely, if ever, directly observed [1], [2], [3]. Researchers have therefore turned to the large amounts of molecular sequence data becoming available when case report data are insufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, one can not simply take the country's population, since some people may not be included in surveys, may have good health conditions excluding them from the seasonal respiratory epidemic processes, etc. In fact, it is a known problem of uncertainty quantification in epidemiological modelling, and the adjustment to observed data for some referent time interval is one of the most widely accepted approaches [24]. At the same time, the scaling and shift procedure αI + β → I is linear as well as the the conservation law, which contains the linear combination of the variables.…”
Section: Influenzamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete subject–level data, which would consist of the exact times at which individuals transition through disease states, are of-ten unavailable (O’Neill, 2010). Fitting SEMs in the absence of complete subject–level data presents a complicated latent variable problem since it is usually impossible to analytically integrate over the missing data (O’Neill, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing approaches to fitting SEMs with intractable likelihoods have largely fallen into four groups: martingale methods, approximation methods, simulation based methods, and data augmentation (DA) methods (O’Neill, 2010). Martingale methods estimate the parameters of interest using estimating equations based on martingales for the counting processes within the SEM, e.g., infections and recoveries (Becker, 1977, Watson, 1981, Sudbury, 1985, Andersson and Britton, 2000, Linden-strand and Svensson, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%