1998
DOI: 10.2307/2668187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction and Overview: Assessment in the Context of Culture and Pedagogy: A Collaborative Effort, a Meaningful Goal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, several research studies have shown that culture has a significant effect on test‐taking performance (Arbuthnot, 2011a, 2015a, 2015b; Arbuthnot & Lyons‐Thomas, 2016; Gilbert et al., 2008, 2009; Hood, 1998a, 1998b; Hood, Hopson, & Frierson, 2005; Hood, Gilbert, & Arbuthnot 2006;). In the United States, research has shown that cultural context impacts how test‐takers approach standardized tests (Arbuthnot, 2011; Cohen & Ibarra, 2005).…”
Section: Educational Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, several research studies have shown that culture has a significant effect on test‐taking performance (Arbuthnot, 2011a, 2015a, 2015b; Arbuthnot & Lyons‐Thomas, 2016; Gilbert et al., 2008, 2009; Hood, 1998a, 1998b; Hood, Hopson, & Frierson, 2005; Hood, Gilbert, & Arbuthnot 2006;). In the United States, research has shown that cultural context impacts how test‐takers approach standardized tests (Arbuthnot, 2011; Cohen & Ibarra, 2005).…”
Section: Educational Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of the funding agency being the only or primary driver to evaluation, CRE allowed a more responsive evaluation model where social justice and evaluation meet for getting closer to understanding and transforming the root causes of community issues, gaps, and long-standing problems of health, social, educational, or economic factors participants of programming faced. Building off of the responsive evaluation design (Stake, 1972), CRE deepened evaluation to locally situate and study issues of importance to community members and stakeholders who are most impacted by the or those who have the most at stake in the evaluation results, including underrepresented and vulnerable populations (Hood, 1999, 2001; Hood, Hopson, & Frierson, 2005, 2015).…”
Section: Wsihkaang (Wh-see-kong)—western Door: Perseverance and Unknomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…My first reference point for this reflection was the period of 1998 through 2003. Prior to 1998, my work had primarily focused on “culturally responsive assessment” (Hood, , ); the limited production of minority doctoral recipients by top‐ranked colleges and schools of education (Hood & Freeman ); and the virtual absence of minority doctoral recipients in research methods, educational measurement, and statistics (Hood & Freeman, ). My use of the term culturally responsive assessment was a direct result of this collaboration between key African American educational researchers who were (and continue to be) leading the investigation into the use of culturally responsive pedagogy (Gloria Ladson‐Billings, University of Wisconsin‐Madison and Carole Lee, Northwestern University) and those of us who were having a similar conversation about the reasonableness of developing culturally responsive/specific assessment approaches (Gwyneth Boodoo, ETS, Audrey Qualls, Iowa Testing Programs/University of Iowa, and myself).…”
Section: Reflective Reference Point 1: Heightening the Importance Of mentioning
confidence: 99%