Abstract:Governmental agencies and the medical and psychological professions are calling for a greater focus on the negative mental health effects of climate change (CC). As a first step, the field needs measures to distinguish affective/emotional distress due to CC from impairment that requires further scientific and diagnostic attention and that may require treatment in the future. To this end, we constructed the climate change distress and impairment scale, which distinguishes CC distress (spanning anger, anxiety, a… Show more
“…Studies using measures other than the CCAS to assess forms of climate change distress further support an association between these forms of climate-related-emotions and psychological illbeing. To illustrate, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms correlate positively with measures of eco-anxiety (Hogg et al, 2021;Stanley et al, 2021), climate change distress and impairment (Hepp et al, 2023;Searle & Gow, 2010), climate change worry (Gago & Sá, 2021;Stewart, 2021), and ecological stress (Lutz et al, 2023).…”
Section: Climate Anxiety Is Negatively Associated With Wellbeingmentioning
Climate anxiety refers to the negative emotional reactions that a person can experience in response to climate change irrespective of prior direct experience with it. Research suggests this emotional reaction ranges from successful coping and adaptation to clinical-level psychological impairment. The Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS) was designed to measure a person’s level of climate anxiety impairment. However, inconsistent results when testing the relationship between CCAS scores and psychological wellbeing measures have raised questions about the scale’s validity and usefulness for assessing climate change’s mental health impacts. Our goal was to quantitatively measure the direction and strength of the correlations between climate anxiety (as indexed by the CCAS) and measures of psychological wellbeing. We identified 25 studies and 60 effect sizes for inclusion, and meta-analytic results indicated a strong negative correlation between overall CCAS scores and psychological wellbeing (r = -.296, 95% CI [-.360; -.230], p < .001). The meta-analytic estimates were consistent across CCAS subscales and diagnosis-specific measures of wellbeing. Multilevel meta-regressions used to estimate the influence of potential moderators indicated that the correlations were stronger when the sample’s mean level of environmental identity was higher, and when a measure indicative of mental unwellness was used. We discuss implications for the nature of the relationship between climate anxiety and psychological wellbeing in general, and for the use of the CCAS in clinical and broader contexts.
“…Studies using measures other than the CCAS to assess forms of climate change distress further support an association between these forms of climate-related-emotions and psychological illbeing. To illustrate, depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms correlate positively with measures of eco-anxiety (Hogg et al, 2021;Stanley et al, 2021), climate change distress and impairment (Hepp et al, 2023;Searle & Gow, 2010), climate change worry (Gago & Sá, 2021;Stewart, 2021), and ecological stress (Lutz et al, 2023).…”
Section: Climate Anxiety Is Negatively Associated With Wellbeingmentioning
Climate anxiety refers to the negative emotional reactions that a person can experience in response to climate change irrespective of prior direct experience with it. Research suggests this emotional reaction ranges from successful coping and adaptation to clinical-level psychological impairment. The Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS) was designed to measure a person’s level of climate anxiety impairment. However, inconsistent results when testing the relationship between CCAS scores and psychological wellbeing measures have raised questions about the scale’s validity and usefulness for assessing climate change’s mental health impacts. Our goal was to quantitatively measure the direction and strength of the correlations between climate anxiety (as indexed by the CCAS) and measures of psychological wellbeing. We identified 25 studies and 60 effect sizes for inclusion, and meta-analytic results indicated a strong negative correlation between overall CCAS scores and psychological wellbeing (r = -.296, 95% CI [-.360; -.230], p < .001). The meta-analytic estimates were consistent across CCAS subscales and diagnosis-specific measures of wellbeing. Multilevel meta-regressions used to estimate the influence of potential moderators indicated that the correlations were stronger when the sample’s mean level of environmental identity was higher, and when a measure indicative of mental unwellness was used. We discuss implications for the nature of the relationship between climate anxiety and psychological wellbeing in general, and for the use of the CCAS in clinical and broader contexts.
“…For instance, for climate/eco-anxiety, measures include the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS; Clayton & Karazsia, 2020), the Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS-13;Hogg et al, 2021), the Eco-Anxiety Questionnaire (EAQ-22;Ágoston et al, 2022) and the climate anxiety subscale of the Inventory of Climate Emotions (ICE; Marczak et al, 2022). For climate change worry and distress, measures include the Climate Change Worry Scale (CCWS; Stewart, 2021), and the Climate Change Distress and Impairment Scale (CC-DIS; Hepp et al, 2023). This list only includes the validated measures that were identified in a review by Cianconi et al (2023).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EnglishNote. Mentioned scales are the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CCAS;Clayton & Karazsia, 2020), the Environmental Concerns Scale (ECS; also referred to as Environmental Motives Scale (EMS);Schultz, 2001) the Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS-13;Hogg et al, 2021), the Lee environmental concern measure(Lee, 2008), the Climate Change Worry Scale (CCWS;Stewart, 2021), the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory adjusted to climate change (STAI-Y1;Spielberger, 1983;Ogunbode et al, 2022), the Ojala climate worry measure(Ojala, 2012), the Anxiety about Climate Change Survey (ACCS;Klingler & Darner, 2020;Meixner et al, 2023), the Brief Climate Change Distress Scale (BCCDS;Latkin et al, 2022), the Climate Change Distress and Impairment Scale (CC-DIS;Hepp et al, 2023), the Eco-Anxiety Questionnaire(EAQ-22;Ágoston et al, 2022), and the climate anxiety subscale of the Inventory of Climate Emotions (ICE;Marczak et al, 2022).1 A preprint is available with a German translation of the EAQ-22: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3606150/v1…”
Climate anxiety is a phenomenon that is gaining importance due to the general public’s increased awareness of the worsening climate crisis. At present, climate anxiety is not operationalized consistently across the existing literature. It is important to gain more consensus on the definition and operationalization of climate anxiety to facilitate reliable and generalizable research and to further develop interventions. Content analysis can contribute to this by providing insight into the overlap in the content of climate anxiety measures. With a systematic search, this study identified and analyzed 12 distinct scales measuring climate anxiety. The 119 items covered a total of 57 disparate symptoms. Jaccard indices showed that the mean overlap between symptoms of different climate anxiety scales was generally very low, as was the overlap between pairwise comparisons of climate anxiety scales. These results highlight the lack of uniformity in assessing climate anxiety and the need to properly define and operationalize this concept. The potential reasons for low overlap and how this might impact the reliability and validity of existing measures is discussed. It is critical that future work aims at finding consensus on the definition of climate anxiety (e.g., through a Delphi study) and psychometrically comparing the different questionnaires.
“…Various scales have been developed to assess environmental-related anxiety. Climate anxiety can be assessed using the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (Clayton & Karazsia, 2020), Climate Change Worry Scale (Stewart, 2021), and Climate Change Distress and Impairment Scale (Hepp et al, 2023). As its name suggests, the Climate Change Anxiety Scale (CAS) focuses on climate anxiety in terms of the cognitive, emotional, and functional impairments, experiences of climate change (direct or indirect) and proenvironmental engagement.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Climate Change Worry Scale specifically targets social and personal worry by evaluating anxious rumination (Stewart, 2021). More broadly, Hepp et al (2023) recently proposed the Climate Change Distress and Impairment Scale to assess different negative affects in response to climate change (i.e., anxiety, anger, sadness, and guilt) and evaluate general, social, and work/school-related impairments. To assess eco-anxiety, Hogg et al (2021) developed the Hogg Eco-Anxiety Scale (HEAS) in two steps.…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.