The Cambridge Companion to Margaret Atwood 2006
DOI: 10.1017/ccol0521839661.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This situation can appear in an ecosystem where companies and other systems are consistenly involved in reciprocative study, (Cooke et al, 1999(Cooke et al, , p.1582. The area of creativity has been known as a significant parts of the competition between the countries, (Howells, 2006;Ruten, 2008;Cooke, 2005;Goessling, 2008). Rationally, the general ideas that try to give clear explanation of things which determine the competition between countries like modern industriousness areas, (Sabel,1985(Sabel, & 1990Priore,1990), appointed as a system of flexible output (Markusen, 1997&1998;Langlois, 1996;Glasmeier, 1992;Robertson, 1996) and creativity environments (Maillat, 1999;Crevoisier,2005) have toghether which they undertake creativity as a main conductor for all the activities of entrepreneurship and so the pratical development of the areas and the countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situation can appear in an ecosystem where companies and other systems are consistenly involved in reciprocative study, (Cooke et al, 1999(Cooke et al, , p.1582. The area of creativity has been known as a significant parts of the competition between the countries, (Howells, 2006;Ruten, 2008;Cooke, 2005;Goessling, 2008). Rationally, the general ideas that try to give clear explanation of things which determine the competition between countries like modern industriousness areas, (Sabel,1985(Sabel, & 1990Priore,1990), appointed as a system of flexible output (Markusen, 1997&1998;Langlois, 1996;Glasmeier, 1992;Robertson, 1996) and creativity environments (Maillat, 1999;Crevoisier,2005) have toghether which they undertake creativity as a main conductor for all the activities of entrepreneurship and so the pratical development of the areas and the countries.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis takes a sociological, cultural, and communications approach rather than literary to the study of CF, answering Trexler and Johns-Putra’s (2011) call for a “new literary and critical climate” to study CF that goes beyond the single-work analysis common in literary criticism or the focus on place in ecocriticism, recognizing the strengths of different approaches (p. 197). A significant literature has already explored the works of Margaret Atwood, including Oryx and Crake (see, e.g., Bergthaller, 2010; Glass, 2013; Howells, 2006), and some recent attention has also analyzed Ian McEwan’s body of work (Groes, 2008) as well as that of Barbara Kingsolver’s novels (Wagner-Martin, 2014). Trexler’s (2015) recently published extensive examination of CF includes commentary on Oryx and Crake , Solar , and Flight Behavior , among many other selections.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%