The Deportation Regime 2010
DOI: 10.1215/9780822391340-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 207 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, the confinement and expulsion of ‘unwanted’ foreigners reformulates and reaffirms state sovereignty. On the other, these practices are constitutive of political subjectivities including those of ‘citizen’, ‘resident’, ‘immigrant’ and ‘foreigner’ (Peutz and De Genova, 2010; Ugelvik, 2014b). Given the apparent emergence of a bifurcated system of justice that is directed at foreign-nationals in the UK, it is important to consider how this particular aspect of British penality is subjectively experienced ‘on the ground’ (Bosworth and Turnbull, 2015; Kaufman and Bosworth, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the one hand, the confinement and expulsion of ‘unwanted’ foreigners reformulates and reaffirms state sovereignty. On the other, these practices are constitutive of political subjectivities including those of ‘citizen’, ‘resident’, ‘immigrant’ and ‘foreigner’ (Peutz and De Genova, 2010; Ugelvik, 2014b). Given the apparent emergence of a bifurcated system of justice that is directed at foreign-nationals in the UK, it is important to consider how this particular aspect of British penality is subjectively experienced ‘on the ground’ (Bosworth and Turnbull, 2015; Kaufman and Bosworth, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Such law and policy changes are shifting both the purposes and experiences of punishment in the UK through the production of deportable subjects whose rights to remain begin to unravel upon conviction. Imprisonment is often the first stage in a complex process in which identity, belonging and punishment intertwine in the lives of those enmeshed in what Peutz and De Genova (2010) term the deportation regime. For many non-citizen residents of the UK, the consequences of criminal convictions are increasingly serious and life-shattering, potentially undoing long histories of habitation, familial relations and livelihoods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These repetitions begin to show how pleasure, fear and desire organize, orient, move and relate bodies, the ways in which pleasure, fear and desire are organized and regulated through the moral economy of the state and its borders, and how this moral economy allows or forces movement on some bodies defined in particular ways while others must stay in place. (Grewal 2005; Luibhéid, 2008; Luibhéid and Cantú, 2005; Peutz and DeGenova, 2010; Puar, 2007; Razack, 1998; White, 2010, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The politics of migration is often connected to debates over the survival of political community and national identity, as well as to debates over the provision of the ‘good’ society (Castles, 2002). From this perspective, border security and deportation regimes are treated as tools by which to enforce the distinction between who is ‘in’ or ‘out’ of political community (Peutz and De Genova, 2010). Individuals and families are thus constituted as ‘criminal’ or ‘irregular’ for having entered political territories, or over-stayed visas, without state authorisation (Betts, 2010; Dauvergne, 2008).…”
Section: Threatening Political Community?mentioning
confidence: 99%