The Persistence of Global Masculinism 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68360-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As several film scholars have argued, post-9/11 American cinema has shaped and influenced how the public understood the “war on terror” (e.g., Kellner 2010; Markert 2011; McSweeney 2014). Given the clandestine nature of drone surveillance and warfare, and the power of cultural narratives to “change beliefs, reinforce preexisting views, or even displace knowledge gained from other sources for elites as well as mass audiences” (Daniel and Musgrave 2017, 503), it is crucial that scholars examine popular culture representations of drone warfare, which often focuses on the drone pilot (Kammerer 2012; Hasian 2016) since they can “elucidate the gendered and masculinist impulses contained in drone warfare and subjectivity” (Nicholas and Agius 2018, 117).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As several film scholars have argued, post-9/11 American cinema has shaped and influenced how the public understood the “war on terror” (e.g., Kellner 2010; Markert 2011; McSweeney 2014). Given the clandestine nature of drone surveillance and warfare, and the power of cultural narratives to “change beliefs, reinforce preexisting views, or even displace knowledge gained from other sources for elites as well as mass audiences” (Daniel and Musgrave 2017, 503), it is crucial that scholars examine popular culture representations of drone warfare, which often focuses on the drone pilot (Kammerer 2012; Hasian 2016) since they can “elucidate the gendered and masculinist impulses contained in drone warfare and subjectivity” (Nicholas and Agius 2018, 117).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having said that, connections of (political) masculinities with public political domains are all too clear in much mainstream politics, not only in populist, authoritarian, ethno-nationalist, fascist and militaristic politics but also in somewhat different ways in democratic, liberal, socialist, anarchist, cyber and various other activist politics. At the collective level, many forms of mainstream, socialist, nationalist and right-wing politics harbour gender-inequitable, hierarchical, patriarchal and masculinist ideologies and practices (Bebel, 1971;Kollantai, 1977Kollantai, [1909 ;Cockburn, 1988;Brittan, 1989;Nicholas and Agius, 2017). Some of these forms of mainstream politics can be explicitly or implicitly gender conscious (Egeberg Holmgren and Hearn, 2009); some are simply misogynist and anti-feminist.…”
Section: 'Political Domains'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…involuntary celibates) and ‘pick-up artists’ (i.e. open debates of politicised rape fantasies) (Nicholas and Agius, 2018).…”
Section: Fantasy Narratives Emotional Governance and The Far-right Po...mentioning
confidence: 99%