Performance-Driven Surrogate Modeling of High-Frequency Structures 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-38926-0_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 172 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The modeling approach introduced in this paper falls into the category of performance-driven techniques 75 . The fundamental concepts of this paradigm are outlined in brief in this section for the convenience of the reader.…”
Section: Reference-design-free Domain-confined Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The modeling approach introduced in this paper falls into the category of performance-driven techniques 75 . The fundamental concepts of this paradigm are outlined in brief in this section for the convenience of the reader.…”
Section: Reference-design-free Domain-confined Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The designs that are superior from the viewpoint any given set of performance requirements (e.g., required return loss levels, power split, phase relations, etc., over target operating frequencies or bandwidths) normally occupy low-dimensionality manifolds, the volume of which is tiny in comparison to the original (interval-like) design space. This leads to the following benefits 75 : The metamodel can be established with the use of a considerably smaller number of data samples, in contrast to conventional domains; The curse of dimensionality can be overcome to a large extent; Domain confinement does not limit neither the ranges of the design variables nor the operational conditions the surrogate is valid within. …”
Section: Reference-design-free Domain-confined Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In practice, utilizing general-purpose modeling techniques poses problems for devices featuring more than a few geometry parameters 70 72 . The mitigation methods include domain confinement 73 , 74 , incorporation of variable-resolution EM simulations 75 , as well as the response feature methodology 76 . The latter benefits from a weakly-nonlinear dependence of the coordinates of appositely singled out characteristic points of antenna responses on the geometry parameters (as opposed to the complete responses), which allows—upon reformulation of the design problem with the use of response features—for a faster convergence of the optimization process 77 , or a reduction of the number of training samples (in the context of surrogate modeling 78 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Acceleration methods include the incorporation of techniques for fast evaluation of circuit response gradients (adjoint sensitivities 30 , 31 , mesh deformation 32 , parallelization 33 ), replacing numerical derivatives by updating formulas 34 , as well as utilization of sparse sensitivity updates 35 37 . In a more generic setting, surrogate-assisted procedures have been gaining considerable attention 38 41 , both in the context of physics-based (space mapping 42 , adaptive response scaling 43 , manifold mapping 44 ), and data-driven models (radial basis functions 45 , kriging 46 , artificial neural networks 47 , ensemble learning 48 , support vector regression 49 ), along with variable-resolution methods (co-kriging 50 , Bayesian model fusion 51 ). Surrogate-based methods are applied for both local 52 , 90 93 and global optimization 53 55 , but also multi-criterial design 56 59 , and uncertainty quantification 60 62 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%