Introduction

Karamanos, Spyros A.; Dijkstra, Gert J.; Gresnigt, A.M.; Huinen, Wouter; Georgiadi-Stefanidi, Kyriaki

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-49892-4_1

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2024

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 10 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…At the beginning of the 21st century, Lao et al continued to carry out the pipe-soil interaction test [6] , and introduced micromechanics and digital image processing technology to conduct in-depth research on the micromechanical properties and failure mechanism between pipelines and soil. In addition, the European Commission carried out a full-scale test on the pipe-soil interaction of X60 and X65 pipelines in 2020, the resistance displacement relationship in axial and lateral directions of pipesoil was obtained by the test [7].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study on applicability of mathematical model of pipe-soil interaction

Hou,

Liu,

Sun

et al. 2024

J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The applicability of the soil spring calculation model given in China’s standard SY/T 7403 “Code for strain-based design of oil & gas transmission pipelines” and GB/T 50470 “Seismic technical code for oil and gas transmission pipeline engineering” to large-diameter pipelines is not clear. In this paper, the soil spring calculation formulas recommended in the two standards are analyzed, and the corresponding finite element numerical simulation models are established. The applicability of the lateral and vertical soil spring models in the two standards is discussed. The results show that the calculation accuracy of the two standards needs to be improved, and the applicability is different for different pipe diameters and soil properties.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%