Douglas Sirk, Aesthetic Modernism and the Culture of Modernity 2017
DOI: 10.3366/edinburgh/9781474409391.003.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Abstract: After describing one of Peter Greenaway's recent efforts to move beyond the limits of the cinema, Evans proposes that Douglas Sirk had already begun to dissolve the boundaries the medium by assimilating elements of avant-garde art, architecture and design into his mise-en-scène. She goes on to assert that Sirk's importation of a high art aesthetic into the low genre of melodrama echoed the widespread European Modernist preoccupation with the creation of a synergistic Gesamtkunstwerk or "total art work" during … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As I approach the semantics of "obtaining" verbs from the perspective of Cognitive Semantics, my study draws heavily on the four fundamental principles of Cognitive Semantics (Evans & Green 2006): ①. Language refers not to an objective reality, but to concepts: the conventional meanings associated with words and other linguistic units are seen as relating to thoughts and ideas.…”
Section: "Obtaining" Verbs and Semantic Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As I approach the semantics of "obtaining" verbs from the perspective of Cognitive Semantics, my study draws heavily on the four fundamental principles of Cognitive Semantics (Evans & Green 2006): ①. Language refers not to an objective reality, but to concepts: the conventional meanings associated with words and other linguistic units are seen as relating to thoughts and ideas.…”
Section: "Obtaining" Verbs and Semantic Framementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They acknowledge the existence of the metaphor as pervasive in everyday life, a tool for understanding, and that, it is a property of cognition. They argued further that in CMT, imagination to map and understand experiences metaphorically or metonymically on the basis of image schema with 2 ontological correspondences between the domains ( source or X and target or Y, where the latter is understood in terms of the former); at the level of language, entities, attributes and processes in the target domain are lexicalized using words and expressions from the source domain (Croft and Cruse, 2004; Lakoff and Johnson,1980,1991& 2003Kövecses, 2002Gibbs, 1994;Langacker, 1999;Grady, 1997;Evans and Green, 2006). Therefore, they view a metaphor as understanding one conceptual domain in terms of another (Ritchie, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%