Theoretical Physics on the Personal Computer 1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-97088-7_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(B.4) Aside from units (most treatments use the so-called chemistry units), these all agree with results in the literature [3,13]. Use of the optimally determined parameters, c 1 ≈ 0.0803 and c 2 ≈ 0.0099, and k ≈ 0.908 determines the energy via equation (B.1).…”
Section: A4 Matrix Equation For I Max =supporting
confidence: 79%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(B.4) Aside from units (most treatments use the so-called chemistry units), these all agree with results in the literature [3,13]. Use of the optimally determined parameters, c 1 ≈ 0.0803 and c 2 ≈ 0.0099, and k ≈ 0.908 determines the energy via equation (B.1).…”
Section: A4 Matrix Equation For I Max =supporting
confidence: 79%
“…In reality, minimization of the energy with Hy yields E Hy ≈ −78.979 eV, with variational parameters c 1 ≈ 0.0803 and c 2 ≈ 0.0099 and k ≈ 0.908. Evaluating the necessary integrals and obtaining these results is well documented [3,13], and so these are simply summarized in appendix B. The attained energy is within 0.05% of the exact result (−79.014 eV); we consider this sufficiently close to justify our adoption for the present purposes of 1 √ N | Hy as the 'exact' normalized helium wavefunction, with N given below.…”
Section: Hylleraas Wavefunction: Bound Statesmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The nomenclature ν 1 , ν 2 , ν 3 , ν 4 has been consistent since Herzberg (1945), Shimanouchi (1972) and up to the present time (Jäger et al 1986); some authors prefer to call ν 2 'umbrella mode'. In scattering from central potentials the dominant partial cross sections σ shift towards higher with an increase in the effective radius of the potential (Landau and Lifshitz 1965, section 123), and the number of minima in the elastic cross sections as a function of scattering angle increases (Schmid et al 1988, Koonin 1986. It is thus tempting to attribute the 'bumpy' shape of NF 3 (i.e.…”
Section: Elastic Differential Cross Sections and Their Integralsmentioning
confidence: 99%