A Feminist Reader in Early Cinema 2002
DOI: 10.1215/9780822383840-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Women's absence from canonised historical filmographies is a common theme in feminist film scholarship (e.g. Bean and Negra 2002; Beeston and Solomon 2023; Field 2022; Gledhill and Knight 2015; Mukherjee 2020; Stigsdotter 2019). This rich body of scholarship has frequently interrogated the ideological significance of the archival lacunae, a multifarious challenge common to all historians but exacerbated by the fact that women, alongside other groups historically marginalised because of their ethnicity, race, sexuality and so on, ‘have left few historical traces, their role in production of film culture obscured by more publicly visible or self-promotional male partners or concealed behind collective or collaborative practices’ (Gledhill and Knight 2015, 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women's absence from canonised historical filmographies is a common theme in feminist film scholarship (e.g. Bean and Negra 2002; Beeston and Solomon 2023; Field 2022; Gledhill and Knight 2015; Mukherjee 2020; Stigsdotter 2019). This rich body of scholarship has frequently interrogated the ideological significance of the archival lacunae, a multifarious challenge common to all historians but exacerbated by the fact that women, alongside other groups historically marginalised because of their ethnicity, race, sexuality and so on, ‘have left few historical traces, their role in production of film culture obscured by more publicly visible or self-promotional male partners or concealed behind collective or collaborative practices’ (Gledhill and Knight 2015, 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%