Introducing the Pluriverse of the Anthropocene: Toward an Ontological Politics of Environmental Governance in Indonesia

Abstract

This chapter introduces an idea that is gaining increasing prominence in discussions of the Anthropocene: the idea of the pluriverse. We argue that the very condition of the Anthropocene can serve as an opportunity to give serious consideration to the ontological thesis of the pluriverse, namely that there are many kinds of worlds, some of which may allow for “social” relations that are constituted by “more-than-human” beings. In the first part of the chapter, we draw from the literature on the pluriverse and studies of indigenous worlds that have appeared in the past decade to elaborate on the idea of the pluriverse, highlighting, in particular, the ethical motivation that underpins calls to recognize different kinds of worlds. In the second part of the chapter, we consider the implications of the pluriverse in Indonesia, particularly in relation to “adat revivalism” and CSR practice. We suggest that an “ontological politics” toward the recognition and preservation of many kinds of worlds can be understood in Indonesia as a struggle to deepen Bhinneka Tunggal Ika (Unity in Diversity), which the modern Indonesian state has long professed to be one of its foundational principles.

Archetypes of community-based pond aquaculture in Indonesia: applying the social-ecological systems framework to examine sustainability tradeoffs

“…Existing policy evaluation tools have been criticized as not reflecting the actual social-political and environmental reality of local communities [40]. Failing to include community members in decision-making and the narrow focus on production indicators have been cited as key reasons why policy programs are missing their targets, because they overlook the importance of assessing the underlying social and environmental conditions driving performance [41][42][43]. The widely implemented PITAP program (Participatory Pond Irrigation Management), for example, offers direct payments to farmers who contribute to canal maintenance but largely overlooks investing into capacities (e.g.…”

Rethinking “Decoloniality and Futurity” for the Anthropocene: A Speculative Spectrality

“…This design should be focused on interspecies justice by rethinking the matrix of geopolitics, capitalism, and global colonial projection. Thus, introduction of the pluriverse of the Anthropocene is needed to reclaim "very condition of the Anthropocene as a way to call attention seriously consideration on ontological politics" (Mahaswa & Kim, 2023), namely, there are many kinds of worlds governed by all living beings during this ongoing epoch.…”

Melampaui Kearifan Lokal: Dari Dekolonisasi Teknologi sampai Krisis Iklim Antroposen

“…Kondisi ini merupakan kekosongan "pengetahuan" sehingga perlu adanya rekognisi berkaitan atas pengetahuan atas kekosongan solusi ini. Melalui rekognisi, semua alternatif pengetahuan baru beserta kritiknya akan melebur dalam proses politik keseharian untuk merancang strategi penyelesaian krisis yang terjadi (Mahaswa & Kim, 2023). Hal ini dapat dimulai dengan mulai membuka percakapan publik tentang keberadaan kearifan lokal yang sering kali tersembunyi atau disembunyikan dengan pendekatan yang lebih luas pada konteks pendekatan ilmiah sehingga adaptasi dan mitigasi krisis tidak hanya sekadar berbicara secara konseptual, tetapi juga dapat dibuktikan dengan laku yang lebih nyata (Widuri dkk., 2023).…”