Objective: To survey US-trained graduating neurology residents who are American Academy of Neurology members, in an effort to trend perceived quality and completeness of graduate neurology education.Methods: An electronic survey was sent to all American Academy of Neurology members graduating from US neurology residency programs in the Spring of 2014.Results: Of 805 eligible respondents, 24% completed the survey. Ninety-three percent of adult neurology residents and 56% of child neurology residents reported plans to pursue fellowship training after residency. Respondents reported a desire for additional training in neurocritical care, neuro-oncology, neuromuscular diseases, botulinum toxin injection, and nerve blocks. There remains a clear deficit in business training of neurology residents, although there was notable improvement in knowledge of coding and office management compared to previous surveys.Discussion: Although there are still areas of perceived weakness in neurology training, graduating neurology residents feel generally well prepared for their chosen careers. However, most still pursue fellowship training for reasons that are little understood. In addition to certain subspecialties and procedures, practice management remains deficient in neurology training and is a point of future insecurity for most residents. Future curriculum changes should consider resident-reported gaps in knowledge, with careful consideration of improving business training. Neurology ® 2016;86:e112-e117 Graduate medical education is a constantly changing landscape built on the optimization of resident education, experience, and workload. In neurology, defining the best resident curriculum is challenged by a particularly rapid expansion of knowledge and shifting accreditation requirements. Among other tools for monitoring the state of neurology residency training in the United States, the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) surveys neurology residency program directors to evaluate national curriculum structure, effects of duty hour restrictions, and trends in recruitment and matching of residents. [1][2][3][4] To understand trainee perceptions of neurology education, the AAN routinely surveys US-trained, AAN-member adult and child neurology residents. 5,6 Previous resident surveys offered key insights into relative gaps in didactic curriculum, including basic neuroscience and business management, as well as resident perceptions of inadequate exposure to certain procedures and subspecialties.Herein, we present the third survey of graduating AAN-member adult and child neurology residents in the United States, performed in an effort to longitudinally measure the structure and quality of graduate neurology education. In addition, delving further into previously noted deficiencies, much focus is given to procedural skills, diagnostic test interpretation, subspecialty exposure, practice preparation, and precise aspects of business training.METHODS The survey instrument, presented in supplemental data on the Neurology ® We...