2002
DOI: 10.2975/26.2002.63.69
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing Structured Dialogue with people with mental illness into the training of social work students.

Abstract: This paper presents the findings from an innovative project in which people with mental illness were incorporated in the classroom setting of social work students in Israel. This project was based on a model that was defined as "Structured Dialogue." Its objective was to create opportunities for students to relate to persons with mental illness in a less stigmatic and more hopeful way. One hundred and eighty five students participated in this evaluation that was conducted in fifteen social work classes. The fi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
28
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
6
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Arkar & Eker, 1992 No significant differences Callaghan et al, 1997 No significant differences Chinsky & Rappaport, 1970 Inc. favorable, dec. negative traits; less dangerous Cook et al, 1995 More positive attributes Improved attributions Desforges et al, 1991 Improved attitudes Iguchi & Johnson, 1966 Dec. in negative views Kish & Hood, 1974 More positive attitudes Kolodziej & Johnson, 1996 Improved attitudes Shor & Sykes, 2002 No significant differences Stein et al, 1992 More positive attitudes Weller & Grunes, 1988 No significant differences Note. Findings are reported in simplistic terms for ease of tabulation SMI (e.g., they should live with other people as opposed to living in a psychiatric hospital), and indicated they would be more likely to give a person with SMI a job (Vezzoli et al, 2001).…”
Section: Prospective Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Arkar & Eker, 1992 No significant differences Callaghan et al, 1997 No significant differences Chinsky & Rappaport, 1970 Inc. favorable, dec. negative traits; less dangerous Cook et al, 1995 More positive attributes Improved attributions Desforges et al, 1991 Improved attitudes Iguchi & Johnson, 1966 Dec. in negative views Kish & Hood, 1974 More positive attitudes Kolodziej & Johnson, 1996 Improved attitudes Shor & Sykes, 2002 No significant differences Stein et al, 1992 More positive attitudes Weller & Grunes, 1988 No significant differences Note. Findings are reported in simplistic terms for ease of tabulation SMI (e.g., they should live with other people as opposed to living in a psychiatric hospital), and indicated they would be more likely to give a person with SMI a job (Vezzoli et al, 2001).…”
Section: Prospective Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study investigated whether a program called the 'Structured Dialogue' can reduce negative attitudes in Israeli mental health trainees (Shor & Sykes, 2002). This program is led by individuals with a mental illness who attempt to facilitate a dialogue with mental health professionals (or mental health students) about coping with mental illness.…”
Section: Prospective Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, assignments giving students the opportunity to experience and reflect upon the community services that frequently serve individuals with schizophrenia (e.g., drop-in centers or clubhouses) can also be effective avenues for increasing contact with this population. Another approach, reported by Shor and Sykes (2002), is to incorporate structured dialog between students and individuals with mental illness in the classroom as promising avenue for increasing student contact with this population. While it will be important to first see if the findings of this research generalize to other social work students, given the results of this study, such methods may provide social workers with the exposure they need to persons with schizophrenia that optimizes their attitudes toward these individuals and the impact of classroom learning on these attitudes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Social work educators have also applied these findings to address attitudes and values development among their students. For example, Shor and Sykes (2002) found that the integration of individuals with mental illness in the social work classroom setting was effective at reducing students' stereotypes toward this population. Moreover, some have suggested that the effects of intergroup contact may moderate the effects of knowledge on attitude development and change, such that individuals who have had more contact with a stigmatized population may be more influenced by new stereotype-incongruent information (Pettigrew, 1998;Weber & Crocker, 1983).…”
Section: Intergroup Contact and Attitude Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such interventions can include promotion of social interactions among persons with mental illness, employers and co-workers that may help reduce fear and misconceptions about persons with mental illness. Extending the Israeli project 'structural dialogue' (Shor & Sykes, 2002) can be one form of such interactions. In this project, persons with mental illness told their personal stories in a workplace setting.…”
Section: Can We Battle the Burden Of Mental Health Stigmamentioning
confidence: 99%