2017
DOI: 10.53841/bpspag.2017.1.102.21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing social vulnerability and compliance as factors for understanding offending in autism spectrum disorder

Abstract: Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) predominantly comply with the law, although a minority engage in offending behaviours resulting in the involvement of the Criminal Justice System (CJS). This research presents and investigates the role of social vulnerability and compliance as factors that may help to explain offending in ASD. It is hypothesised that heightened social vulnerability and compliance may increase the vulnerability of these individuals to be manipulated and exploited into committing o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…284 Re Nuplex Industries, above n 171, at [14]-[15] and [22]; and Re Fliway Group Ltd HC Auckland CIV-2017-404-2704, 20 November 2017 at [14]-[15] and [22]. 285 Re Nuplex Industries, above n 171, at [25]- [27]; and Re Fliway Group Ltd, above n 284, at [25]- [27].…”
Section: Determination Of Interest Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…284 Re Nuplex Industries, above n 171, at [14]-[15] and [22]; and Re Fliway Group Ltd HC Auckland CIV-2017-404-2704, 20 November 2017 at [14]-[15] and [22]. 285 Re Nuplex Industries, above n 171, at [25]- [27]; and Re Fliway Group Ltd, above n 284, at [25]- [27].…”
Section: Determination Of Interest Classesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of any necessary collaboration can cause a takeover under the Code to occur in a hostile, rather than friendly, manner. 27 The second key difference is that, the process for a takeover offer is prescribed solely by the rules of the Code, 28 whereas, the process for a scheme is governed by both the CA and the court. 29 Under a scheme, two court hearings are required, the first for direction on any procedural matters and the second for the court to make a decision whether to sanction the scheme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%