1999
DOI: 10.4135/9781849209373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing Social Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
275
0
76

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 566 publications
(360 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
275
0
76
Order By: Relevance
“…While this is largely due to the absence of a proper mathematical definition of multigraphs (or multiplex graphs), the possibility and implications of having two or more types of links were approached by sociologists since the 1960s (Mitchell, 1969;Burt, 1992;Eve, 2002), notably looking at the effects of having both personal and professional relations within a given organization on individuals' career evolution. Such multiedge relations are thus called two-dimensional in social network analysis in opposition to singlestranded edges or links (Larson and Starr, 1993 ;Degenne and Forsé, 1999); they sometimes allow directionality (multidigraph) and the existence of loops, self-loops, or self-edges (pseudograph). In practice, multigraphs are often analyzed as simple graphs where links have multiple attributes allowing the application of conventional network analytical methods (Wasserman and Faust, 1994;Newman, 2010).…”
Section: Multigraphs Multiplex Graphs and Coupled Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this is largely due to the absence of a proper mathematical definition of multigraphs (or multiplex graphs), the possibility and implications of having two or more types of links were approached by sociologists since the 1960s (Mitchell, 1969;Burt, 1992;Eve, 2002), notably looking at the effects of having both personal and professional relations within a given organization on individuals' career evolution. Such multiedge relations are thus called two-dimensional in social network analysis in opposition to singlestranded edges or links (Larson and Starr, 1993 ;Degenne and Forsé, 1999); they sometimes allow directionality (multidigraph) and the existence of loops, self-loops, or self-edges (pseudograph). In practice, multigraphs are often analyzed as simple graphs where links have multiple attributes allowing the application of conventional network analytical methods (Wasserman and Faust, 1994;Newman, 2010).…”
Section: Multigraphs Multiplex Graphs and Coupled Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 근접중심성(closeness centrality): 한 개인이 다른 개인 과 얼마나 가까운지를 말한다 (Degenne & Forse, 1999).  매개중심성(betweenness centrality): 한 개인이 다른 개 인과 네트워크를 구축하는데 '매개자 혹은 중재자(bridge)'의 역할을 하는 정도를 말한다 (Son, 2002).…”
Section: ) 네트워크 중심성(Centrality)unclassified
“…This second way to reduce information complexity is to apply social network analysis (SNA) [10]. Within structural traditions in sociology, SNA is applied to handle large complex relational data sets, covering information about social relations.…”
Section: Technology Enhanced Learning In Europementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Members have properties which are derived from SNA, describe their positions, and are used to estimate the importance of the members in the network modeled than in the i*-framework. Some important types of centrality are: the Degree centrality, a property which measures in the most straight forward way the member's social capital in the network ; the Closeness centrality CC m , taking into account the closeness of the member m to every other member [4,10,15]; the Betweenness centrality, estimating the possibility of a member to influence the communication of others [4,10,15]. Efficiency is used to detect structural holes in the neighbourhood of a member v. Structural hole is a relationship between two non redundant P r e -t e x t s T r a n s c r i…”
Section: Cross Media Social Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%