2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing Service Learning To Under Graduate Engineering Students Through EPICS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this activity, students divided into eight groups, [6] where students actively involved in this activity and learned the design thinking process. To understand the community related problem, wallet activity was conducted for students shown in figure 2 [22]. The students design of the wallet depends on community partner requirement, and from this process students know about how to interact with community partner, how to design the product and provide solution to the community partner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this activity, students divided into eight groups, [6] where students actively involved in this activity and learned the design thinking process. To understand the community related problem, wallet activity was conducted for students shown in figure 2 [22]. The students design of the wallet depends on community partner requirement, and from this process students know about how to interact with community partner, how to design the product and provide solution to the community partner.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, considering the crucial role that communities play, and the challenges they sometimes face in service learning with regard to a lack of power, this study aimed to garner insights in term of the community (SMEs) satisfaction regarding the MC service learning programme that was designed to assist SMEs in South Africa. Additionally, a majority of research only considers service learning from the university student perspective and largely overlooks the community partner viewpoint (Naik et al, 2020;Cromhout et al, 2021;Jordaan & Mennega, 2021).…”
Section: Conceptual Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most inquiries only consider the benefits of service learning from the student stance perspective, so there is a gap in research that investigates the community partner/client benefits (Naik et al, 2020;Cromhout et al, 2021;Jordaan & Mennega, 2021). Additionally, a number of American investigations examine the student benefits of student-run agencies (Haygood et al, 2019;Ranta et al, 2020;Borgognoni & LeBlanc Wicks, 2021), but none consider benefits from the client perspective, which is another gap in research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have examined the influence of business-related SL projects on community partners, which identified a number of community partner benefits: saved money and improved the services (Mungaray-Lagarda et al, 2022; Rinaldo et al, 2019); increased knowledge and skills, reduced costs, improved operations and strategical engagement (Schoenherr, 2015); had a positive impact on the business (Mungaray-Lagarda et al, 2022; Rinaldo et al, 2019); assisted with funding access and increased capacity (Mungaray-Lagarda et al, 2022; Plaut, 2013); increased bargaining power and realized economies of scale (Schoenherr, 2015); improved organisational governance, human resources, leadership, communications and fundraising (Krasynska et al, 2013); created value and satisfaction (Rinaldo et al, 2019; Scholtz, 2018); established new partnerships and increased community engagement awareness (Goertzen et al, 2016); and created new target markets, improved advertising reach, assisted marketing campaign planning, developed new products and increased brand reach (Scholtz, 2018; Vizenor et al, 2017). Since SL’s commencement, there has been a demand for additional inquiry that investigates the benefits for community partners/client organisations (instead of focussing on the student benefits) derived from SL projects (Cromhout et al, 2021; Matthews, 2019; Naik et al, 2020; Rinaldo et al, 2019).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%