2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing Scrum in a Very Small Enterprise: A Productivity and Quality Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, a number of in-vivo studies have been made on diverse aspects of the software process in small organizations such as requirements engineering problems and practice (Khankaew and Riddle 2014), the benefits of using Scrum (Caballero et al 2011), software inspection (Misra et al 2014), the practices of self-organizing Agile teams (Hoda et al 2012), knowledge management in small teams (O'Connor and Basri 2012), factors that motivate software engineering teams (Verner et al 2014), factors that may influence the adoption of best practice (Cater-Steel 2000), program of process improvement software (Schoeffel and Benitti 2012) and the influence of SPI on business success in software SMEs (Clarke and O'Connor 2012b). These studies use live observation or surveys as their research methodology, so that the findings are based on actual process but they do not address the entire software process.…”
Section: Software Process In Small Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, a number of in-vivo studies have been made on diverse aspects of the software process in small organizations such as requirements engineering problems and practice (Khankaew and Riddle 2014), the benefits of using Scrum (Caballero et al 2011), software inspection (Misra et al 2014), the practices of self-organizing Agile teams (Hoda et al 2012), knowledge management in small teams (O'Connor and Basri 2012), factors that motivate software engineering teams (Verner et al 2014), factors that may influence the adoption of best practice (Cater-Steel 2000), program of process improvement software (Schoeffel and Benitti 2012) and the influence of SPI on business success in software SMEs (Clarke and O'Connor 2012b). These studies use live observation or surveys as their research methodology, so that the findings are based on actual process but they do not address the entire software process.…”
Section: Software Process In Small Organizationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caballero et al [21] provide a case study to introduce Scrum in a very small enterprise. The objective is to analyze productivity and quality of Scrum model with a similar experience of Team Software Process (TSP).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several attempts to analyze the integration of XP and Scrum from last few years [21][22][23][24][25] [27], the Scrum process is not assessed fully in the previous literature though there is an enormous acceptance of Scrum in the software industry. It is argued that less than 5% of the previous studies provide effective evidence that agile software development addresses Scrum.…”
Section: Problem Statementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, the Scrum ceremonies were identified as being very helpful. Caballero, Calvo-manzano, and Feliu (2011) studied how an organisation attempted to improve project productivity by introducing Scrum to assess the impact on efficiency and product quality standards. Their finding is that that Scrum can improve productivity without compromising quality in a very small enterprise.…”
Section: Studies On Enablers Of Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%