2018
DOI: 10.1111/1755-0998.12944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing ribosomal tandem repeat barcoding for fungi

Abstract: Sequence comparison and analysis of the various ribosomal genetic markers are the dominant molecular methods for identification and description of fungi. However, new environmental fungal lineages known only from DNA data reveal significant gaps in our sampling of the fungal kingdom in terms of both taxonomy and marker coverage in the reference sequence databases. To facilitate the integration of reference data from all of the ribosomal markers, we present three sets of general primers that allow for amplifica… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
77
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sanger and high throughput sequencing) have played a central role in expanding our understanding of the dimensions of aquatic fungal diversity by accessing DNA sequences from environmental samples. However, since the early diverging fungal lineages do not share a consistent barcode and suffer from severe reference database gaps, a unifying ribosomal barcode is currently being established and refined 30,47 for third generation long-read sequencers (e.g. PacBio, Oxford Nanopore Technologies).…”
Section: Emerging Methods Concepts and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Sanger and high throughput sequencing) have played a central role in expanding our understanding of the dimensions of aquatic fungal diversity by accessing DNA sequences from environmental samples. However, since the early diverging fungal lineages do not share a consistent barcode and suffer from severe reference database gaps, a unifying ribosomal barcode is currently being established and refined 30,47 for third generation long-read sequencers (e.g. PacBio, Oxford Nanopore Technologies).…”
Section: Emerging Methods Concepts and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33 ). Furthermore, when coupled to single cell microscope inspections, third generation long-read sequencing may help to close the huge reference data gaps for aquatic fungi 47,86 . The increased read length allows to sequencing whole genes (e.g., the complete ribosomal operon) or gene clusters, which facilitate a potential subspecies level of taxonomic resolution.…”
Section: Emerging Methods Concepts and Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Ashikawa et al [157] used nanopore sequencing to identify five species of Candida in positive blood culture bottles and compared its performance with Sanger sequencing. Wurzbacher et al [158] used nanopore sequencing to screen fungal herbarium specimens for a rarely studied fungal ribosomal repeat (intergenic spacer, IGS), which is longer than the internal transcribed spacer (ITS), but it is not a good choice for Sanger sequencing due to the numerous reactions that are required to cover the length, time it takes to complete the multiple reactions, and costs. The MinION sequencer easily processes these regions, as this platform can sequence templates hundreds of kilobases long, and showed similar accuracy to Sanger sequencing [159].…”
Section: Nanopore Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%