2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10453-017-9490-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing DNA-based methods to compare fungal microbiota and concentrations in indoor, outdoor, and personal air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…DNA libraries were constructed according to a protocol reported elsewhere [ 32 ]. Briefly, the fungal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region was amplified with universal fungal primers ITS1F and ITS2 [ 33 , 34 ] along with adapter sequences for Illumina MiSeq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…DNA libraries were constructed according to a protocol reported elsewhere [ 32 ]. Briefly, the fungal internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) region was amplified with universal fungal primers ITS1F and ITS2 [ 33 , 34 ] along with adapter sequences for Illumina MiSeq.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The full sequence processing protocol is available elsewhere [ 32 ]. Briefly, the paired-end reads were joined with a minimum allowed overlap of 10 bp in QIIME version 1.8.0 [ 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taxon-specific plant quantity was estimated by multiplying the DNA sequencing-derived relative abundance of each taxon by the total plant quantity by the universal plant-specific qPCR, as previously described (Yamamoto et al, 2014;Dannemiller et al, 2014;An et al, 2018). The calculated genus-level deposition flux densities were confirmed to be biologically reproducible with a cumulative coefficient of variation of 91% on an arithmetic scale ( Fig.…”
Section: Calculationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 1 261 572 reads from 43 libraries were mapped onto 97 % OTUs (Table S1). Taxonomic assignment was performed using the SINTAX algorithm with a cutoff value of 0.5 (Edgar, 2018) against the ITS2 database (Sickel et al, 2015;Ankenbrand et al, 2015). P tests were performed using mothur v.1.39.5 (Schloss et al, 2009) to compare taxonomic structures.…”
Section: Dna Sequence Processing and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%