Introducing Care 4.0: An Integrated Care Paradigm Built on Industry 4.0 Capabilities

Chute, Chaloner; French, Tara

doi:10.3390/ijerph16122247

Cited by 62 publications

(37 citation statements)

References 18 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Technology information support can improve the efficiency of health services. Internet medicine is regarded as a way of creating a more sustainable system [55]. The Chinese government has attached great importance to the application and development of digital health and care.…”

Section: The Using Of Supply-side Policy Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of Policy Instruments on Integrated Care in China: Based on Documents Content Analysis

Xin

Liu

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Facing the aggravating trend of an aging population and a fragmented medical service delivery system, the Chinese Central Government has introduced a series of policies to promote the development of integrated care against the background of the “Healthy China Strategy”. The achievement of integrated care depends on the choice of policy instruments. However, few studies have focused on how policy instruments promote the practice of integrated care in China. This article aims to obtain a deeper understanding of the use of policy instruments in the development of integrated care in China. Policy documents are the carriers of policy instruments. National-level integrated care policy documents from 2009 to 2019 were selected. Using the qualitative document analysis method, this paper conducts an analysis of integrated care policy instruments. In order to comprehensively view the integrated care policy instruments, a three-dimensional analytical framework consisting of the policy instruments dimension, stakeholders dimension, and health service supply chains dimension is proposed. The results are as follows. (1) From the perspective of policy instruments, the integrated care policy has adopted supply-side policy instruments, demand-side policy instruments, and environmental policy instruments. Among the three types of policy instruments, environmental policy instruments are used most frequently, supply-side policies are preferred, while demand-side policy instruments are relatively inadequate. (2) As for the stakeholders dimension, the central policy instruments focus on the health service providers, while less attention is paid to the health service demanders. (3) In terms of health service supply chains, the number of policy instruments used in the prevention stage is the highest, followed by the treatment stage, whereas less attention paid to the rehabilitation stage. Finally, suggestions were made for the development of integrated care by better perfecting policy instruments.

show abstract

Section: The Using Of Supply-side Policy Instrumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Selection of Policy Instruments on Integrated Care in China: Based on Documents Content Analysis

Xin

Liu

2020

IJERPH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The programme aimed to support innovation in health and care through PD by involving all stakeholders and users in the design of products, services and systems to ensure they are driven by user needs [35]. Over five years, the team delivered in excess of 25 projects across a breadth of challenges in health and social care [21]. Projects aimed to use a collective understanding of the current experience to consider preferable new ways of working and caring, enabled by technology [36].…”

Section: Development Of the Spaces Modelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Spaces for Participatory Design Innovation

Teal

French

2020

Proceedings of the 16th Participatory Design Conference 2020 - Participation(s) Otherwise - Volume 1

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper presents a model to guide the design of participatory design (PD) projects, which was generated through methodological reflection on a programme of digital health and care research. Building on wide use of the term spaces within PD literature and theory, the model comprises seven spaces that can be designed to support diverse stakeholders to engage in a PD process. The model encourages reflection on the capacity of participants to critically and creatively engage with the concepts being proposed, in order to design a process to scaffold participation. Aiming to support PD practitioners and researchers to identify the combination and sequence of hybrid spaces required to move participants and concepts towards resolved designs, the model guides the careful design of each space supported by examples of practice. The model is also designed to enable reflective practice and articulation of PD processes to support integration within multidisciplinary collaborations. CCS CONCEPTS • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI) ; HCI design and evaluation methods ; User models; Interaction design ; Interaction design process and methods ; Participatory design; Interaction design ; Interaction design process and methods ; Contextual design.

show abstract

“…The Health 4.0 concept is derived from IR 4.0. Health 4.0 aims to deliver patient-centric care through establishing trust among the stakeholders, facilitating improved data management, developing a sharing mechanism and also safeguarding trust and security issues [5]. This unique setting with diverse stakeholders such as doctors, nurses, researchers, patients, insurance providers and suppliers makes the health care delivery process more complex [6].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Mapping Research Trends of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Disruptive technology, blockchain is propelling a technological intervention in healthcare due to its unique features and advantages. The healthcare industry is migrating to Health 4.0. Therefore, peer-to-peer (P2P) transactions in a decentralized and distributed manner make blockchain more lucrative to serve the needs of the healthcare industry of today. The revolutionary system blockchain has been discussed in the field of healthcare over the past five years. Hence, a systematic investigation of the existing body of knowledge concerning blockchain research in the healthcare domain is essential. The motivation of this study is to support further study based on the current research trend analysis through graphical visualization and analysis of the bibliographic material. Therefore, this study maps the expansion of scientific and academic research conducted concerning blockchain relevant to healthcare by utilizing a bibliometric analytic method to understand the state of the art. Bibliometric statistics have been utilized to analyze current scientific articles published in the Scopus database from 2016 to 2019. In addition, an overview of the publication trends over the first three months of 2020 has been undertaken to understand the research trend for the current year so far. The study serves the purpose of mapping research development trends in this area. The outcome discovered some beneficial insights such as the yearly trend of publications, top listed authors, institutes, countries and publishers from around the world. Moreover, this paper assists scholars to develop a theoretical framework to provide a primary source of reference in this field for further study of blockchain technology in the healthcare domain. INDEX TERMS Blockchain, bibliometric analysis, Health 4.0, healthcare, Scopus database.

show abstract

Introducing Care 4.0: An Integrated Care Paradigm Built on Industry 4.0 Capabilities

Cited by 62 publications

References 18 publications

Selection of Policy Instruments on Integrated Care in China: Based on Documents Content Analysis

Selection of Policy Instruments on Integrated Care in China: Based on Documents Content Analysis

Spaces for Participatory Design Innovation

Mapping Research Trends of Blockchain Technology in Healthcare

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About