2022
DOI: 10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing an Abusive Language Classification Framework for Telegram to Investigate the German Hater Community

Abstract: Because traditional social media platforms continue to ban actors spreading hate speech or other forms of abusive languages (a process known as deplatforming), these actors migrate to alternative platforms that do not moderate user content to the same degree. One popular platform relevant for the German community is Telegram for which limited research efforts have been made so far. This study aimed to develop a broad framework comprising (i) an abusive language classification model for German Telegram message… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Edge-based inclusion criteria differentiate between the types of edges accepted in the unknown underlying network of Telegram entities. Sampling designs considering all kinds of references (e.g., forwards, @-mentions, invite links) as viable network edges (Bovet & Grindrod, 2022;Wich et al, 2022) necessarily discover a different network structure than those that only consider one such reference type (Hoseini et al, 2021;Peeters & Willaert, 2022) or invite links (Curley et al, 2022). Consequently, implicit entity selection needs to be considered, as forwarded messages only refer to the message's sender (either a channel or an individual user); thus, public chat groups cannot be detected if invite links and @-mentions are excluded.…”
Section: Specific Decisions In Snowball Sampling and Their Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Edge-based inclusion criteria differentiate between the types of edges accepted in the unknown underlying network of Telegram entities. Sampling designs considering all kinds of references (e.g., forwards, @-mentions, invite links) as viable network edges (Bovet & Grindrod, 2022;Wich et al, 2022) necessarily discover a different network structure than those that only consider one such reference type (Hoseini et al, 2021;Peeters & Willaert, 2022) or invite links (Curley et al, 2022). Consequently, implicit entity selection needs to be considered, as forwarded messages only refer to the message's sender (either a channel or an individual user); thus, public chat groups cannot be detected if invite links and @-mentions are excluded.…”
Section: Specific Decisions In Snowball Sampling and Their Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Curley et al (2022) ensured the representativity of the discovered channels using a review by two experts. Wich et al (2022) filtered channels by language to exclude non-German channels. Urman and Katz (2022b) filtered by word occurrence at the message level to ensure relevance.…”
Section: Specific Decisions In Snowball Sampling and Their Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Toxicity has been extensively studied on popular social media websites such as Twitter ( 15 , 16 ), Reddit ( 17 , 18 ), and similar platforms ( 19 , 20 ). However, much of these research focuses on automated toxicity detection and prevalence estimation rather than on evaluating its impact ( 21 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%