2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing a self-consistent test and the corresponding modification in the Barrett, Joyner and Halenda method for pore-size determination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(56 reference statements)
2
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it must be taken into account that the BJH method used in the generation of PSD plots from the isotherm systematically underestimates the pore diameter. 39 Despite these PSD curves were corrected by Kruk-Jaroniec-Sayari method, 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 (Table S1). This loss is clearly closer to the second loss of MIL-100(Fe).…”
Section: Febtc-10minmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it must be taken into account that the BJH method used in the generation of PSD plots from the isotherm systematically underestimates the pore diameter. 39 Despite these PSD curves were corrected by Kruk-Jaroniec-Sayari method, 34 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 (Table S1). This loss is clearly closer to the second loss of MIL-100(Fe).…”
Section: Febtc-10minmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a and b) of the four samples are identified as type IV isotherms with H3‐hysteresis loops , indicated that the samples show flat slit structure, cracks or wedge structure. The PSD in mesoporous materials is usually determined by BJH theory, which based on the capillary condensation theory, using the Kelvin equation, where a cylindrical pore geometry is assumed and the desorption branch data of the isotherm are used , the calculated parameters of samples are listed in Table . The average pore sizes of MGO‐NH 2 , MGO‐PAMAM‐G1.0, HMGO‐NH 2 , and HMGO‐PAMAM‐G1.0 are 6.8536, 5.9751, 15.5569, and 15.4874 nm, respectively, indicating the existence of mesoporous.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…35 The phase structure of the spent and fresh catalysts was characterized by using X-ray diffractometer (XRD, X'Pert MPD Pro, Panalytical, Netherlands) with Cu Ka radiation (l ¼ 1.5408Å) at 40 kV and 40 mA. The model used to calculate the pore size distribution is BJH method desorption pore size distribution.…”
Section: Catalyst Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%