1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)10471-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing a placebo needle into acupuncture research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

8
561
1
24

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 805 publications
(602 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
8
561
1
24
Order By: Relevance
“…In the other RCT that found large, clinically relevant benefits of acupuncture (46), the sham needles did not penetrate the skin. Although some shams with nonpenetrating needles have demonstrated credibility among acupuncturenaive patients (55), the credibility of the sham in the RCT (46) was not tested among the acupuncture-naive patients. Thus, we cannot be certain that this nonpenetrating needle sham was believable for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the other RCT that found large, clinically relevant benefits of acupuncture (46), the sham needles did not penetrate the skin. Although some shams with nonpenetrating needles have demonstrated credibility among acupuncturenaive patients (55), the credibility of the sham in the RCT (46) was not tested among the acupuncture-naive patients. Thus, we cannot be certain that this nonpenetrating needle sham was believable for all patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sham / placebo acupuncture administration-Placebo treatment used a validated sham acupuncture needle (Streitberger placebo) [16,17,19,28,31,37,40] and was identical to active manual acupuncture except that the needle was not inserted into the skin and the acupuncturist held and rotated the needle more gently. The sham needles differed from regular needles by possessing blunt and retractable tips.…”
Section: Acupuncture Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5] Studies examining the blinding effectiveness of the sham devices usually investigate similarities between the sensory intensities elicited by the sham and real needles that are felt by the participants. 1 If the sensory intensities to both needle types are not statistically different from each other, then it is indirectly inferred that the sham device is capable of blinding the participant. However, Takakura and Yajima 6 commented that the presence of a needle penetration sensation was not indicative of whether the participants believed a real needle was administered.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The true positive rate and false positive rate are analogous to the outcome measures of sensitivity and 1-specificity, respectively, in the study of diagnostic accuracy. 8 To obtain d=, the true positive rate is subtracted from the false positive rate and then 1,9 Multiple acupoints, which may include both traditional and nontraditional acupoints, should ideally be used to simulate clinical practice better. Second, previous studies have also used between-groups designs to compare real and sham needle discrimination using the sham devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%