Subjectivation in Political Theory and Contemporary Practices 2016
DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-51659-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing a Contorted Subject Called ‘Subjectivation’

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…144-168) remains one of the best sources on these distinctions. 2 For a historical overview, see Oberprantacher and Siclodi (2016). 3 In the following argument, I use the language of class in the more expansive sense of group.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…144-168) remains one of the best sources on these distinctions. 2 For a historical overview, see Oberprantacher and Siclodi (2016). 3 In the following argument, I use the language of class in the more expansive sense of group.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La tensión agencia-estructura nos lleva a entender la subjetivación política como la confrontación entre el ideal de subjetividad autónoma y la realidad de la heteronomía (Oberprantacher & Siclodi, 2016). Para que una acción genere consecuencias políticas es necesario que exista un mínimo entramado contrahegemónico que evite su caracterización como excentricidad o locura (Romero Bachiller, 2006).…”
Section: La Subjetivación Políticaunclassified