2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.molmed.2016.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Cancer Risk Factors and Aging

Abstract: Two recent stimulating publications have examined the causes of cancer, comparing “bad luck” vs. environment as main risk factors for cancer incidence. However, bringing aging into the picture might question the entire debate.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), to overall cancer risk in humans (4547). However, the interplay between all these factors makes it difficult to tease out the various contributions using epidemiological data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), to overall cancer risk in humans (4547). However, the interplay between all these factors makes it difficult to tease out the various contributions using epidemiological data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A robust and precise marker, which can be used to estimate the biological age of organisms and to evaluate the effect of different interventions on lifespan has been a Holy Grail of aging research since the first days of this field. Various biomarkers of age have previously been suggested, which are based on telomere length ( Harley et al, 1990 ), mutation accumulation ( Dollé et al, 2000 ; Podolskiy et al, 2016 ; Podolskiy and Gladyshev, 2016 ), gene expression levels ( de Magalhães et al, 2009 ) or T-cell-specific DNA rearrangements ( Zubakov et al, 2010 ). However, these approaches to construct a precise biomarker of age proved to be relatively limited in their potential to assess the aging process and examine its modulation by various interventions, mostly due to large variability of detected ages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 31 . A question for future work is whether mutation load agrees with the scaled Weibull function or age-specific mutational signatures 32 – 34 . Another interesting observation is that testicular germ cell cancer incidence peaks at younger age compared to other cancer types, which might be explained by accelerated aging of testis 31 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%