Abstract:Transcript elongation can be interrupted by a variety of obstacles, including certain DNA sequences, DNAbinding proteins, chromatin, and DNA lesions. Bypass of many of these impediments is facilitated by elongation factor TFIIS through a mechanism that involves cleavage of the nascent transcript by the RNA polymerase II/TFIIS elongation complex. Highly purified yeast RNA polymerase II is able to perform transcript hydrolysis in the absence of TFIIS. The "intrinsic" cleavage activity is greatly stimulated at mi… Show more
“…Although the long linker between the A12.2 N-and C-terminal domains could in principle allow swinging of the C-terminal domain into the pore, our results suggest that the effect of A12.2 truncation on cleavage is due to an allosteric rearrangement in the Pol I active center. The conserved polymerase active site is capable of RNA cleavage in the absence of cleavage stimulatory factors, since free Pol II and the bacterial RNA polymerase can cleave RNA under mild alkaline conditions (Orlova et al, 1995;Weilbaecher et al, 2003). Consistently, the intrinsic cleavage activity of Pol I increased with increasing pH ( Figure 5C).…”
Section: Pol I Has Intrinsic Rna Cleavage Activitysupporting
SUMMARYSynthesis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) by RNA polymerase (Pol) I is the first step in ribosome biogenesis and a regulatory switch in eukaryotic cell growth. Here we report the 12 Å cryoelectron microscopic structure for the complete 14-subunit yeast Pol I, a homology model for the core enzyme, and the crystal structure of the subcomplex A14/43. In the resulting hybrid structure of Pol I, A14/43, the clamp, and the dock domain contribute to a unique surface interacting with promoter-specific initiation factors. The Pol I-specific subunits A49 and A34.5 form a heterodimer near the enzyme funnel that acts as a built-in elongation factor and is related to the Pol II-associated factor TFIIF. In contrast to Pol II, Pol I has a strong intrinsic 3 0 -RNA cleavage activity, which requires the C-terminal domain of subunit A12.2 and, apparently, enables ribosomal RNA proofreading and 3 0 -end trimming.
“…Although the long linker between the A12.2 N-and C-terminal domains could in principle allow swinging of the C-terminal domain into the pore, our results suggest that the effect of A12.2 truncation on cleavage is due to an allosteric rearrangement in the Pol I active center. The conserved polymerase active site is capable of RNA cleavage in the absence of cleavage stimulatory factors, since free Pol II and the bacterial RNA polymerase can cleave RNA under mild alkaline conditions (Orlova et al, 1995;Weilbaecher et al, 2003). Consistently, the intrinsic cleavage activity of Pol I increased with increasing pH ( Figure 5C).…”
Section: Pol I Has Intrinsic Rna Cleavage Activitysupporting
SUMMARYSynthesis of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) by RNA polymerase (Pol) I is the first step in ribosome biogenesis and a regulatory switch in eukaryotic cell growth. Here we report the 12 Å cryoelectron microscopic structure for the complete 14-subunit yeast Pol I, a homology model for the core enzyme, and the crystal structure of the subcomplex A14/43. In the resulting hybrid structure of Pol I, A14/43, the clamp, and the dock domain contribute to a unique surface interacting with promoter-specific initiation factors. The Pol I-specific subunits A49 and A34.5 form a heterodimer near the enzyme funnel that acts as a built-in elongation factor and is related to the Pol II-associated factor TFIIF. In contrast to Pol II, Pol I has a strong intrinsic 3 0 -RNA cleavage activity, which requires the C-terminal domain of subunit A12.2 and, apparently, enables ribosomal RNA proofreading and 3 0 -end trimming.
“…The absence of an effect of ␣-amanitin (which blocks trigger loop transition), on endonuclease cleavage in yeast pol II (41), as well as insensitivity of the same reaction to trigger loop deletion in E. coli (40) argues against the involvement of this transition in endonuclease reaction at least in the E. coli and yeast enzymes. In accordance with this conclusion, deletion of the entire trigger loop did not affect substrate discrimination by RNAP (40).…”
Section: Possible Effect Of Rnap Trigger Loop Transitions On Endonu-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coli, and T. aquaticus RNAP, respectively (17,41, and this study). Contrary to E. coli, the endonuclease reaction in yeast pol II enzyme can yet proceed through the pyrophosphorolytic pathway (27).…”
Background: Factor-assisted co-transcriptional proofreading and precise selection of NTP substrates provide high transcription fidelity. Results: Both processes can be achieved through active center tuning (ACT) from the inactive to catalytic state in response to establishing recognition contacts of the reaction substrates. Conclusion: High transcription fidelity can be explained by ACT. Significance: Suggested ACT mechanism represents an exceptional example of substrate recognition coupling to catalysis.
“…Although TFIIS stimulates transcript cleavage by stabilizing Mg 2ϩ II binding, RNAPII can catalyze the same cleavage reaction without TFIIS at slower rates (33). The rate of intrinsic cleavage can be increased by high pH, substitution of Mn 2ϩ for Mg 2ϩ , or high concentrations of Mg 2ϩ (26,33,34). We reasoned that substitution of Mn 2ϩ for Mg 2ϩ had the least potential to perturb RNAPII or DSIF͞ NELF.…”
Section: Dsif͞nelf Does Not Inhibit the Intrinsic Cleavage Activity Omentioning
Formation of productive transcription complexes after promoter escape by RNA polymerase II is a major event in eukaryotic gene regulation. Both negative and positive factors control this step. The principal negative elongation factor (NELF) contains four polypeptides and requires for activity the two-polypeptide 5,6-dichloro-1--D-ribobenzimidazole-sensitivity inducing factor (DSIF). DSIF͞ NELF inhibits early transcript elongation until it is counteracted by the positive elongation factor P-TEFb. We report a previously undescribed activity of DSIF͞NELF, namely inhibition of the transcript cleavage factor TFIIS. These two activities of DSIF͞NELF appear to be mechanistically distinct. Inhibition of nucleotide addition requires >18 nt of nascent RNA, whereas inhibition of TFIIS occurs at all transcript lengths. Because TFIIS promotes escape from promoter-proximal pauses by stimulating cleavage of backtracked nascent RNA, TFIIS inhibition may help DSIF͞NELF negatively regulate productive transcription.transcription elongation ͉ pausing ͉ backtracking R egulation of productive mRNA chain synthesis by RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) occurs when the RNA chain is Ϸ10-100 nt long and determines whether RNAPII forms a fully functional transcription elongation complex (TEC) or halts RNA synthesis during the early stages of transcript elongation (reviewed in refs. 1-5). Conversion to a productive TEC involves an ordered set of transitions that require successive phosphorylation of Ser-5 and Ser-2 in the RPB1 C-terminal heptapeptide repeat domain (CTD) by kinase components of TFIIH and positive elongation factor P-TEFb, respectively. These CTD changes orchestrate release of initiation factors, recruitment of general elongation and chromatin-modifying factors, and capping of the nascent transcript by the capping enzyme. Completion of these steps is required to produce a TEC able to transcribe through nucleosomes on a chromatin template and synthesize full-length pre-mRNAs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.