The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2003
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m211197200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic Transcript Cleavage in Yeast RNA Polymerase II Elongation Complexes

Abstract: Transcript elongation can be interrupted by a variety of obstacles, including certain DNA sequences, DNAbinding proteins, chromatin, and DNA lesions. Bypass of many of these impediments is facilitated by elongation factor TFIIS through a mechanism that involves cleavage of the nascent transcript by the RNA polymerase II/TFIIS elongation complex. Highly purified yeast RNA polymerase II is able to perform transcript hydrolysis in the absence of TFIIS. The "intrinsic" cleavage activity is greatly stimulated at mi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
24
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
4
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the long linker between the A12.2 N-and C-terminal domains could in principle allow swinging of the C-terminal domain into the pore, our results suggest that the effect of A12.2 truncation on cleavage is due to an allosteric rearrangement in the Pol I active center. The conserved polymerase active site is capable of RNA cleavage in the absence of cleavage stimulatory factors, since free Pol II and the bacterial RNA polymerase can cleave RNA under mild alkaline conditions (Orlova et al, 1995;Weilbaecher et al, 2003). Consistently, the intrinsic cleavage activity of Pol I increased with increasing pH ( Figure 5C).…”
Section: Pol I Has Intrinsic Rna Cleavage Activitysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Although the long linker between the A12.2 N-and C-terminal domains could in principle allow swinging of the C-terminal domain into the pore, our results suggest that the effect of A12.2 truncation on cleavage is due to an allosteric rearrangement in the Pol I active center. The conserved polymerase active site is capable of RNA cleavage in the absence of cleavage stimulatory factors, since free Pol II and the bacterial RNA polymerase can cleave RNA under mild alkaline conditions (Orlova et al, 1995;Weilbaecher et al, 2003). Consistently, the intrinsic cleavage activity of Pol I increased with increasing pH ( Figure 5C).…”
Section: Pol I Has Intrinsic Rna Cleavage Activitysupporting
confidence: 58%
“…The absence of an effect of ␣-amanitin (which blocks trigger loop transition), on endonuclease cleavage in yeast pol II (41), as well as insensitivity of the same reaction to trigger loop deletion in E. coli (40) argues against the involvement of this transition in endonuclease reaction at least in the E. coli and yeast enzymes. In accordance with this conclusion, deletion of the entire trigger loop did not affect substrate discrimination by RNAP (40).…”
Section: Possible Effect Of Rnap Trigger Loop Transitions On Endonu-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…coli, and T. aquaticus RNAP, respectively (17,41, and this study). Contrary to E. coli, the endonuclease reaction in yeast pol II enzyme can yet proceed through the pyrophosphorolytic pathway (27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TFIIS stimulates transcript cleavage by stabilizing Mg 2ϩ II binding, RNAPII can catalyze the same cleavage reaction without TFIIS at slower rates (33). The rate of intrinsic cleavage can be increased by high pH, substitution of Mn 2ϩ for Mg 2ϩ , or high concentrations of Mg 2ϩ (26,33,34). We reasoned that substitution of Mn 2ϩ for Mg 2ϩ had the least potential to perturb RNAPII or DSIF͞ NELF.…”
Section: Dsif͞nelf Does Not Inhibit the Intrinsic Cleavage Activity Omentioning
confidence: 99%