2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.96.214430
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic spin-orbit torque in a single-domain nanomagnet

Abstract: International audienc

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 does not generate vertical spin Hall current along the zaxis as one of the mechanisms for T e . Other interfacially based mechanisms [26] for T e = 0 require backscattering of electrons [24,[53][54][55], which is absent in the ballistic transport regime we assume, so we find T e → 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1 does not generate vertical spin Hall current along the zaxis as one of the mechanisms for T e . Other interfacially based mechanisms [26] for T e = 0 require backscattering of electrons [24,[53][54][55], which is absent in the ballistic transport regime we assume, so we find T e → 0.…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…1. Also, in the presence of disorder and thereby induced voltage drop across the central region [25,26,54] we expect that T e would become nonzero and contribute to switching.…”
Section: Sot-driven Classical Dynamics Of Magnetization-mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to describe details of experiments, such as bias voltage dependence of STT in MTJs [8,9] or complex angular dependence of SOT in FM/HM bilayers [45], more involved calculations are needed employing tight-binding or first-principles Hamiltonian as an input. For example, simplistic tight-binding Hamiltonians (TBHs) with single orbital per site have been coupled [46] to nonequilibrium Green's function (NEGF) formalism [47] to compute SOT in FM/HM bilayers [48], or bias voltage dependence of DL and FL components of STT in MTJs which can describe some features of the experiments by adjusting the tight-binding parameters [9]. However, not all features of STT experiments on MTJs [10] can be captured by such NEGF+TBH approach.…”
Section: How To Model Spin Torque Using Nonequilibrium Density Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, not all features of STT experiments on MTJs [10] can be captured by such NEGF+TBH approach. Furthermore, due to spin-orbit proximity effect, driven by hybridization of wave functions from FM and HM layers [49] or FM and metallic surfaces of three-dimensional (3D) TIs [50], simplistic Hamiltonians like the Rashba ferromagnetic model [48,[51][52][53][54][55][56] or the gapped Dirac model [57] are highly inadequate to describe realistic bilayers employed in SOT experiments. This is emphasized by Fig.…”
Section: How To Model Spin Torque Using Nonequilibrium Density Mamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model yields an effective current-induced magnetic field, B ef f SOT = 2m e α R I S × e z /M s , where I S is the in-plane spin cur-rent polarized along the magnetization direction and M s is the magnetic moment of the FM. [18][19][20][21] For the actual NM/FM bilayer, the same model is usually employed by introducing the Rashba SOC localized at the interfacial region. In addition to the FL-SOT, the RE effect can also give rise to DL-SOT.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%