2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.10.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic parameters in the fracture of carbon/carbon composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Damage in brittle matrix composites is concentrated around propagating matrix cracks; their formation and propagation, most frequently, appears first during testing as a result of the low strength and modulus of the continuous medium compared to the reinforcements. All major CMC damage mechanisms such as interfacial debonding, fiber sliding, bridging, and pull‐out are, in one way or another, a result of crack formation and propagation . Accepting that crack growth is the most severe CMC damage mechanism, hence also the energetically most prominent, a direct quantitative measure of the extent of cracking can be obtained by capturing the energy dissipated during CMC testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Damage in brittle matrix composites is concentrated around propagating matrix cracks; their formation and propagation, most frequently, appears first during testing as a result of the low strength and modulus of the continuous medium compared to the reinforcements. All major CMC damage mechanisms such as interfacial debonding, fiber sliding, bridging, and pull‐out are, in one way or another, a result of crack formation and propagation . Accepting that crack growth is the most severe CMC damage mechanism, hence also the energetically most prominent, a direct quantitative measure of the extent of cracking can be obtained by capturing the energy dissipated during CMC testing.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All major CMC damage mechanisms such as interfacial debonding, fiber sliding, bridging, and pull-out are, in one way or another, a result of crack formation and propagation. 32,33 Accepting that crack growth is the most severe CMC damage mechanism, hence also the energetically most prominent, a direct quantitative measure of the extent of cracking can be obtained by capturing the energy dissipated during CMC testing. Herein, measurement of crack growth in SiC/BMAS composites was made possible by adopting a novel methodology for analyzing the thermal energy dissipated by the material during testing and captured via IRT.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During hot-pressing, a carbon-rich layer is formed at the fibers' surface due to the reaction of SiC with the oxides in the matrix [ 30 , 31 ]. This layer provides a weak fibre/matrix interface that is responsible for the development of important energy dissipation mechanisms during loading, such as interfacial debonding, fiber sliding, fiber bridging, and pull-out [ 32 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fatigue limit stress at room temperature is about 60%‐80% of tensile strength (for metal materials, the fatigue limit stress is about 50% of tensile strength), which is much larger than the first cracking stress of matrix. In order to cause fatigue damage of fiber‐reinforced CMCs, matrix cracking needs to appear during the initial cycle, and the fatigue peak stress must be greater than the first matrix cracking stress . During the cyclic loading, the composite modulus decreases, and the width of stress‐strain hysteresis loop and the residual strain increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%