2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic network reactivity differentiates levels of consciousness in comatose patients

Abstract: Our results emphasize the role of intrinsic brain dynamics in assessing the level of consciousness in coma patients and the possibility of employing simple electrophysiological measures to recognize the severity of disorders of consciousness (DOC).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The debilitating effect of TBI can range from mild cognitive disruption to adverse reduction in brain function, depending on the severity of the injury. In severe TBI, the deleterious effects on the brain were more pronounced in more severe cases ( Khanmohammadi et al, 2018 ). As for mild TBI, they are often misdiagnosed ( Palacios et al, 2017 ; Vergara et al, 2018 ), thus risks being left untreated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The debilitating effect of TBI can range from mild cognitive disruption to adverse reduction in brain function, depending on the severity of the injury. In severe TBI, the deleterious effects on the brain were more pronounced in more severe cases ( Khanmohammadi et al, 2018 ). As for mild TBI, they are often misdiagnosed ( Palacios et al, 2017 ; Vergara et al, 2018 ), thus risks being left untreated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These dynamics may be a manifestation of covert cognitive information processing ( Cabral et al, 2017 ; Gonzalez-Castillo et al, 2019 ), and reflect the information capacity of the brain that is thought to be central to consciousness ( Cavanna et al, 2017 ; Tononi et al, 2016 ). Such explorative dynamics have also been observed in both humans and animals during deep sleep ( Brodbeck et al, 2012 ; Houldin et al, 2018 ; Stevner et al, 2019 ), anesthesia ( Hudson et al, 2014 ; Li et al, 2019 ; Varley et al, 2021 ; Vlisides et al, 2019 ; Wenzel et al, 2019 ) or disorders of consciousness ( Demertzi et al, 2019 ; Khanmohammadi et al, 2018 ). Specifically, despite differing molecular mechanisms, general anesthetics such as propofol, ketamine, sevoflurane, and isoflurane have been reported to suppress the flexible brain configurations during wakefulness to a rigid brain configuration that is predominantly shaped by brain anatomy ( Barttfeld et al, 2015 ; Ma et al, 2017 ; Uhrig et al, 2018 ; Zhang et al, 2019 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The score in each CRS-R subscale is determined according to the presence or absence of specific responses to a sensory stimulus, with a higher total score indicating a greater level of consciousness [12,37,38]. GCS is a behavioral measure universally accepted as a gold standard for assessing the severity of a brain injury [2,37,39] and level of consciousness [40] [34] in terms of a patient's ability to respond to stimuli; eye opening (maximum 4 points), best motor response (maximum 6 points), and verbal response (maximum 4 points) are all measured. Each level of response is assigned a number and added together to provide a total score between 3 and 15 [41]; the worse the response, the lower the number [36].…”
Section: Clinical Assessments the Clinical Assessments In This Study ...mentioning
confidence: 99%