2008
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.78.113007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic flavor violation for massive neutrinos

Abstract: It is shown that intrinsic neutrino flavor violation invariably occurs when neutrinos are created within the SM augmented by the known massive neutrinos, with mixing and nondegenerate masses.The effects are very small but much greater than the naive estimate ∆m 2 /E 2 ν or the branching ratio of indirect flavor violating processes such as µ → eγ within the SM. We specifically calculate the probability (branching ratio) of pion decay processes with flavor violation, such as π → µν e , showing nonzero results.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar assumption has been made in Ref. 17 where the decay π → µν e has been considered. In the following, when we use the expression "short time limit", we refer to the time scale defined above.…”
Section: Amplitudes In the Short Time Limitmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A similar assumption has been made in Ref. 17 where the decay π → µν e has been considered. In the following, when we use the expression "short time limit", we refer to the time scale defined above.…”
Section: Amplitudes In the Short Time Limitmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This should be taken into account when comparing our results with the ones of Ref. 17 . However, the fact that the amplitude A W + →e + +νµ calculated with the exact flavor states vanishes is independent of the inclusion of the decay width in the calculation.…”
Section: Pontecorvo Statesmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…which is unacceptable because it tells us that flavor is undefined even at t = 0 [61,68]. A similar paradox, which does not occur in the case of the exact oscillation formulas Eq.…”
Section: A the Pontecorvo Oscillation Formulamentioning
confidence: 99%