2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11425-016-9043-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic derivative, curvature estimates and squeezing function

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fornaess and E. Wold constructed in [10] a bounded convex domain Ω, with C 2 boundary, which is not strongly pseudoconvex and whose squeezing function tends to one at the boundary. It follows from Theorem 1.1 in [37] and Theorem 4 in [18] that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Fornaess and E. Wold constructed in [10] a bounded convex domain Ω, with C 2 boundary, which is not strongly pseudoconvex and whose squeezing function tends to one at the boundary. It follows from Theorem 1.1 in [37] and Theorem 4 in [18] that…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[6,10,18,20]). For more details on various recent results, we refer the readers to the survey papers [7,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear from the definitions that both Fridman invariants and generalized squeezing functions are invariant under biholomorphisms, and both take value in (0, 1]. There have been much study on the Fridman invariant and the squeezing function in recent years, and we refer the readers to two recent survey articles [13,3] and the references therein for various aspects of the current research on this subject.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%