1991
DOI: 10.1007/bf01906598
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic definition of the Colombeau algebra of generalized functions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[19], Sec. 6.3) we may directly generalize the transformation behavior (3), (4) by allowing f (2) Ψ β Φ α to be a matrix with distributional entries and by replacing compositions with distributional pullbacks. One restriction, however, immediately becomes apparent: f (1) Ψ β Φ α has to be supposed smooth in order for the right hand side of (4) to be well defined (i.e., to avoid ill-defined products).…”
Section: Theorem There Exists An Embeddingι : Hommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19], Sec. 6.3) we may directly generalize the transformation behavior (3), (4) by allowing f (2) Ψ β Φ α to be a matrix with distributional entries and by replacing compositions with distributional pullbacks. One restriction, however, immediately becomes apparent: f (1) Ψ β Φ α has to be supposed smooth in order for the right hand side of (4) to be well defined (i.e., to avoid ill-defined products).…”
Section: Theorem There Exists An Embeddingι : Hommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key step in this program was the construction of a diffeomorphism invariant scalar theory in the so-called 'full' setting where one has a canonical embedding of distributions into the algebra [15,17,21,22]. This built upon the pioneering work of [2,7,20]. However in order to develop a theory of generalized differential geometry one needs to go beyond this and have a description of generalized tensor fields, a topic of ongoing research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A solution to this problem can be based on generalizing the space G[Ω, Ω ′ ] introduced in [1], 7.3 (denoted there by G * (Ω, Ω ′ )) to the manifold setting. We shortly recall its definition.…”
Section: Generalized Mappings Valued In a Manifoldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus we do not need to work with local coordinates and use the sheaf structure of the algebra G. In addition the global construction makes it compatible with the geometry of the Riemannian manifold as these embeddings commute with the Laplace operator and hence are preserved under isometries. The embeddings introduced so far in the literature ( [1,7,16]) are 'nongeometric' in that they depend on choices of partitions of unity, cut-offs, etc. (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%