2003
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.68.022101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic decoherence dynamics in smooth Hamiltonian systems: Quantum-classical correspondence

Abstract: A direct classical analog of the quantum dynamics of intrinsic decoherence in Hamiltonian systems, characterized by the time dependence of the linear entropy of the reduced density operator, is introduced. The similarities and differences between the classical and quantum decoherence dynamics of an initial quantum state are exposed using both analytical and computational results. In particular, the classicality of early-time intrinsic decoherence dynamics is explored analytically using a second-order perturbat… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(34 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is just the time when the integrated correlation function of R(t) becomes dominated by quantum fluctuation. Comparing the two factors in (106,107), i.e. the fluctuations of two terms in (24), we obtain a semiclassical estimate of t 2…”
Section: Vanishing Time Averaged Perturbation and Fidelity Freezementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is just the time when the integrated correlation function of R(t) becomes dominated by quantum fluctuation. Comparing the two factors in (106,107), i.e. the fluctuations of two terms in (24), we obtain a semiclassical estimate of t 2…”
Section: Vanishing Time Averaged Perturbation and Fidelity Freezementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical analog of decoherence has been considered in Refs. [273,108,107,106]. Using a perturbative approach the influence of the type of the perturbation and of the dynamics on the quantum-classical correspondence were explored, see also Ref.…”
Section: Composite Systems and Entanglementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the above integral is essentially a classical average (see [14] for some results) over two densities corresponding to two states |ψ 1,2 (0) and is therefore a sort of crosscorrelation function. We expand the phase around the position j * e of the environmental state, Φ ≈ [v ′ e (j c )− v′ e ( jc )](j e −j * e )−[v ′ e (j c )− v′ e ( jc )]( je −j * e ), where v′ e (j c ) = ∂v(j c , j * e )/∂j e is a vector of partial derivatives with respect to the environment, evaluated at the position of the environmental packet j * e .…”
Section: Purity Decaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Somewhat more modestly, several recent works [4][5][6][7][8][9][10] have studied in semiclassical systems the link between the generation of entanglement and the dynamics of the corresponding classical system, including in experimental realizations [11]. The numerical and analytical results obtained so far indicate that the entanglement dynamics in quantum systems having a classically chaotic counterpart sharply differs from those whose classical counterpart is regular, though this difference is dependent on the specificities of the considered systems (types and strengths of the coupling, choice of initial states, etc.).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%