1967
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.1967.1066116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic coercive force of rare earth iron garnets near the compensation temperature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 45,46 ] Furthermore, this increase in coercive field does not approach infinity if the rare‐earth sublattice is unsaturated. [ 47 ] Above compensation temperature, the coercivity decreases as it scales inversely with effective saturation magnetization. Still, the room temperature coercivity is large due to the low saturation magnetization that significantly reduces the demagnetization energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[ 45,46 ] Furthermore, this increase in coercive field does not approach infinity if the rare‐earth sublattice is unsaturated. [ 47 ] Above compensation temperature, the coercivity decreases as it scales inversely with effective saturation magnetization. Still, the room temperature coercivity is large due to the low saturation magnetization that significantly reduces the demagnetization energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Large magnetization reversal fields can be attributed to a spin‐glass state where reversal is dominated by rotation of frozen moments rather than conventional domain wall motion. [ 47,51 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With approximately 1:2 Gd:Yb, T c ≈ 77 K. An advantage to use of such a material is that the sample magnetization is very small, reducing some possible systematic effects [17]. On the other hand the coercive field is roughly given by H c = 250/(|T c /T − 1| + 1) Oe for polycrystalline GdYIG and the increase near T c is due to the low B for a given H when the magnetization of the material is small; this describes the primary dependence of H c on T and the composition [18]. Another interesting point is that the hysteresis loop becomes very square near T c ; this is attributed to the domains being very large when the magnetization of the sample is small [19,20].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large difference in the experimental values of coercivity observed for bulk and nanosized forms suggests that the assumption of the singleedomain state near T comp in bulks may be an idealized concept. In [11], via the investigation of coercivity as a function [27] and [28] for bulk samples may also be due to the fact that the maximum applied fields used in these studies were not large enough to create the full loop states. At low temperature range far apart from the peak region, an increasing tendency of H c with deceasing temperature is observed which is mostly originated from the increase of magnetocrystalline anisotropy as a result of the ordering of the rare-earth sublattice.…”
Section: Magnetic Coercivity H Cmentioning
confidence: 99%