2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2022.102152
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravesical protrusion of giant median prostatic lobe: A case report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Like in our case, both ultrasound and CT scan may all suggest bladder carcinoma [ 4 , 7 ]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cystoscopy are useful investigation to differentiate IPP from primary bladder carcinoma [ 1 , 8 ]. We did not have facilities for MRI, however, cystoscopy was suggestive of giant IPP and therefore appropriate treatment was suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Like in our case, both ultrasound and CT scan may all suggest bladder carcinoma [ 4 , 7 ]. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cystoscopy are useful investigation to differentiate IPP from primary bladder carcinoma [ 1 , 8 ]. We did not have facilities for MRI, however, cystoscopy was suggestive of giant IPP and therefore appropriate treatment was suggested.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IPP is classified/graded as grade 1, 2 and 3, which is equivalent to intravesical prostate length of <5 mm, 5–10 mm and >10 mm, respectively [ 1 ]. Our case had grade 3 IPP evidenced by the dimension of what was thought to be bladder carcinoma by the CT scan as well as abdominal ultrasound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations