2020
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.18587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous Ondansetron in Pregnancy and Risk of Congenital Malformations

Abstract: A population-based cohort study previously evaluated the association between first-trimester exposure to the oral formulations of ondansetron and congenital malformations. After accounting for potential confounding variables, there was no significant association with congenital malformations overall or cardiac malformations, but a small increased risk of oral clefts could not be excluded. 1 Subsequent research has suggested that intravenous administration of ondansetron may be associated with greater risks of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
28
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
3
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The development of the MAX pregnancy cohort by linking maternal and infant claims records has been previously described 18 ; it has been used extensively to study the safety of drugs in pregnancy. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The MarketScan pregnancy cohort was developed similarly, by linking maternal and infant claims. Both data sources include information on maternal demographics, diagnoses, and procedures received during inpatient, outpatient, or emergency department visits, and dispensed outpatient prescription drugs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The development of the MAX pregnancy cohort by linking maternal and infant claims records has been previously described 18 ; it has been used extensively to study the safety of drugs in pregnancy. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 The MarketScan pregnancy cohort was developed similarly, by linking maternal and infant claims. Both data sources include information on maternal demographics, diagnoses, and procedures received during inpatient, outpatient, or emergency department visits, and dispensed outpatient prescription drugs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study used pregnancy cohorts nested in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract (MAX), which includes data on healthcare use for Medicaid beneficiaries nationwide, for the years 2000 to 2014, and the IBM Health MarketScan Research Database (MarketScan), which includes data on healthcare use from a nationwide sample of commercially insured beneficiaries, for the years 2003 to 2015. The development of the MAX pregnancy cohort by linking maternal and infant claims records has been previously described18; it has been used extensively to study the safety of drugs in pregnancy 1920212223242526. The MarketScan pregnancy cohort was developed similarly, by linking maternal and infant claims.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resulting propensity-score adjusted inferential analysis of about 24.000 pregnancies exposed to intravenous ondansetron did not result in increased risk of cardiac malformations (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.86-1.10), oral clefts (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.63-1.43), or any congenital malformation(RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.96-1.08). Unadjusted analyses suggested a small increased risk for cardiac and any malformation (11). These data strongly mitigate the previous data on intravenous ondansetron (9).…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…In January 2020, Huybrechts et al published an additional study on intravenous administration of ondansetron in early pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations (11). In this study, the authors revisited the study population from their original paper, but restricted their analysis to those women who received intravenous ondansetron in first trimester (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two recent cohort studies, one including almost 90 000 pregnancies exposed to prescription ondansetron and one including over 23 000 pregnancies exposed to intravenous ondansetron, did not find an association between exposure and cardiac or general congenital malformations in the newborn. They did, however, find that exposure was associated with a small increased risk of oral cleft (3 in 10 000) 33 34. Considering this relatively small increased risk and the fact that ondansetron is already being used in pregnant women with hyperemesis gravidarum, compared with the risk of severe hyperemesis gravidarum, we find it ethically acceptable to randomise participants to treatment with ondansetron.…”
Section: Methods and Analysismentioning
confidence: 91%