2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00250.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous Iron Sucrose versus Oral Iron Supplementation for the Treatment of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease-A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Multicenter Study

Abstract: Although being equal in short-term efficacy and overall tolerability our results suggest a better gastrointestinal tolerability for iron sucrose. Larger trials are mandatory to prove a possible advantage of iron sucrose in short- and long-term efficacy as well as in tolerability over iron sulfate in the management of IDA in IBD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
187
2
21

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(212 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
187
2
21
Order By: Relevance
“…Another therapeutical option is the treatment with iron i.v. [15] , particularly iron sucrose together with erythropoietin; this combination is effective but its clinical use is limited by high cost and difficulty of administration [16] . In this study we proposed an alternative and potential new treatment for iron deficient anemia in inflammatory bowel disease using a new food supplement with high content of fish cartilage that was well tolerated and without major adverse reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another therapeutical option is the treatment with iron i.v. [15] , particularly iron sucrose together with erythropoietin; this combination is effective but its clinical use is limited by high cost and difficulty of administration [16] . In this study we proposed an alternative and potential new treatment for iron deficient anemia in inflammatory bowel disease using a new food supplement with high content of fish cartilage that was well tolerated and without major adverse reactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of a randomized, controlled, open-label, multicenter study suggested that IV iron sucrose (IS) had a better GI safety profile in comparison to oral iron sulfate, and 5 patients (20.8%) in the oral group and 1 patient (4.5%) in the IV group discontinued the drug due to adverse GI ADEs. Furthermore, only IV iron led to an increase in serum ferritin concentrations (27). In another randomized controlled study, ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) IV and oral iron sulfate were compared.…”
Section: Treatment Of Anemia Due To Ibd and Gi Hemorrhagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In IBD patients, high levels of serum transferrin, soluble transferring receptor, and serum EPO predict the response to intravenous iron supplementation, while low levels indicate the need for concomitant EPO therapy [9] . Two comparative trials (oral vs intravenous iron) have recently been published [29,30] , indicating better tolerability of iv iron sucrose therapy.…”
Section: Intravenous Iron Preparationsmentioning
confidence: 99%