The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41372-019-0320-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous compared with oral iron for the treatment of iron-deficiency anemia in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
41
3
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
41
3
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Another area for exploration is whether oral iron therapy can achieve these targets to the same degree as intravenous iron. 35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another area for exploration is whether oral iron therapy can achieve these targets to the same degree as intravenous iron. 35…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of intravenous iron therapy is that it corrects Hb/Hct and iron stores concurrently and rapidly. Recent systematic reviews indicate that intravenous iron therapy in pregnancy allows more complete achievement of desired Hb concentrations [105,106]. A number of intravenous iron preparations are available, with different dosing schedules, and a detailed discussion of these is outside the scope of the current review.…”
Section: Approach To Iron Administration In Pregnancymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the use of intravenous iron bypasses these hepcidin-mediated pathways and can result in improvements in haemoglobin concentration, functional performance, and quality of life in patients with anaemia of chronic disease seen with kidney failure, 7 heart failure, 8 inflammatory bowel disease, 9 and women's health. 10 , 11 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%