2011
DOI: 10.1002/ana.22458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells for ischemic stroke

Abstract: This study suggests that a bone marrow harvest and reinfusion of autologous MNCs were safe and feasible in acute stroke patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
223
0
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 266 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
223
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Ten small clinical studies of intravenous or intra-arterial cell delivery, including 136 subjects, have reported findings. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] The majority of these were small, single-institution safety and tolerability studies. Only three included a control group, and the value of the control groups is questionable, since in many cases they consisted of patients deemed ineligible for the cell therapy intervention, were not randomised, and did not necessarily undergo any study related procedures.…”
Section: The Acute or Early Subacute Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Ten small clinical studies of intravenous or intra-arterial cell delivery, including 136 subjects, have reported findings. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] The majority of these were small, single-institution safety and tolerability studies. Only three included a control group, and the value of the control groups is questionable, since in many cases they consisted of patients deemed ineligible for the cell therapy intervention, were not randomised, and did not necessarily undergo any study related procedures.…”
Section: The Acute or Early Subacute Paradigmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second one was performed using human neuronal cells and report the safety and feasibility of neuron transplantation for patients with motor stroke [35]. Other clinical trials using bone marrow derived stem cell (BMSC) in stroke have shown the feasibility and safety of the approach [36][37][38][39]. Moniche et al showed that the BMSC in subacute Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) stroke patients could induce changes in serum levels of GranulocyteMacrophage Colony-Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB), and matrix metalloproteinases 2 (MMP-2), which could induce an improved functional outcomes [40].…”
Section: Neural Progenitor Cell Therapy In the Post-acute Phase Of Stmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct intracerebral implantation of stem cells to the peri-infarct region is utilized for the chronic phase with the stroke brain more tolerant of an invasive treatment procedure, but also because of tapered levels of chemoattractants [62]. Direct transplantation was initially examined in chronic stroke patients using neural progenitor cells (NT2N) [63] and in recent years using Notch-induced bone marrow cells (SB-623) [64], with subsequent clinical trials employing intravenous and intra-arterial administration of MSCs in subacute stroke patients [65,66].…”
Section: Mscs Their Mechanism Of Action and Safety Profilementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent clinical trials on transplantation of MSCs have shown their safety in stroke [75,[79][80][81]. In addition to the small number of patients enrolled in these clinical trials, the translation of laboratory protocols for clinical transplant regimens has been marred with major discrepancies including the lack of well-defined release criteria of the donor cells, varying timing, cell dose and route of transplant intervention, altogether deviating from the established preclinical readouts.…”
Section: Translational Challenges Of Msc Therapy For Strokementioning
confidence: 99%