2003
DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.53.135
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intravenous Angiotensin II Does Not Affect Dynamic Baroreflex Characteristics of the Neural or Peripheral Arc

Abstract: The arterial baroreflex system is one of the most important negative-feedback systems that stabilizes arterial pressure (AP) against exogenous pressure perturbation. The arterial baroreflex may be divided into the neural and peripheral arc subsystems [1][2][3]. The neural arc represents the signal transduction pathway from baroreceptor pressure input to efferent sympathetic nerve activity (SNA). The peripheral arc represents the regulatory pathway from SNA to AP. Static characteristics of the two arcs provide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

8
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflex responses in SNA, AP and HR were not attenuated in the presence of ANG II. Dashed boxes indicate the step cycles used for the statistical analysis unaltered, which agreed with a previous study from our laboratory in which intravenous ANG II at 100 ng kg -1 min -1 did not change the dynamic gain of the neural arc in anesthetized rabbits [23]. In contrast, Sanderford and Bishop demonstrated that ANG II at 10 or 20 ng kg -1 min -1 significantly reduced the maximum renal SNA and attenuated the range of baroreflex control of renal SNA in conscious rabbits [9,24].…”
Section: Effects Of Ang II On Open-loop Baroreflex Control Of Snasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Reflex responses in SNA, AP and HR were not attenuated in the presence of ANG II. Dashed boxes indicate the step cycles used for the statistical analysis unaltered, which agreed with a previous study from our laboratory in which intravenous ANG II at 100 ng kg -1 min -1 did not change the dynamic gain of the neural arc in anesthetized rabbits [23]. In contrast, Sanderford and Bishop demonstrated that ANG II at 10 or 20 ng kg -1 min -1 significantly reduced the maximum renal SNA and attenuated the range of baroreflex control of renal SNA in conscious rabbits [9,24].…”
Section: Effects Of Ang II On Open-loop Baroreflex Control Of Snasupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Second, because the vagi were kept intact, low-pressure baroreflexes from the cardiopulmonary region could interact with the arterial baroreflex, affecting estimation of carotid sinus baroreflex transfer functions. However, the transfer functions estimated in the present study were qualitatively similar to those estimated under vagotomized conditions in previous studies (8)(9)(10). We speculate that changes in RSNA, AP, and HR were mainly attributable to CSP input.…”
Section: Limitationssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mean AP (and therefore mean CSP) in the steady state was treated as the operating pressure (P op). To assess the dynamic characteristics of the carotid sinus baroreflex, we randomly assigned CSP to either high (P op ϩ 20 mmHg) or low (Pop Ϫ 20 mmHg) pressure every 500 ms, according to a binary white noise sequence (8)(9)(10). The power spectral density of CSP was reasonably constant up to 1 Hz.…”
Section: Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The closed-loop operating AP (Table 3) provides a rationale for the selection of the mean input pressure of CSP. When CSP was perturbed around the operating-point pressure, however, mean SNA and AP usually decreased (10). The phenomenon may be related to the input pulsatility and the effect of input amplitude (3,17,35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%