Intravenous Angiography Using Computerized Fluoroscopy

Shaw, C. G.; Ergun, David L.; Kruger, Robert A.; Mistretta, Charles A.; Crummy, Andrew B.; Myerowitz, David; Strother, C M; Sackett, Joseph F.; Lysel, M. Van; Zarnstorff, William C.; Turnipseed, William D.

doi:10.1109/tns.1980.4330975

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Table 3 Correlation Coefficients (R) and Standard Error Of T1

Digital Angiographic Technique1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1982

1986

Publication Types

Select...

Article7

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent7

Authors

Journals

Cited by 10 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This is probably due to the fact that hypotraction (MMs' 8~ ) and the time interval differ-and akinetic regions in patients with coronary ence (TID'" 12) ). We decided to compare these artery disease are responsible for low contrast TID two subtraction modes for studying left ventricular images.…”

Section: Table 3 Correlation Coefficients (R) and Standard Error Of Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction cineangiocardiography with conventional contrast ventriculography for the determination of the left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise

Birchler

Hess

Murakami

et al. 1985

European Heart Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

) mask mode subtraction (MMS), (2) time interval difference (TID) method and (3) a combination of MMS and TID called MMS+ TID method. With the MMS method good correlations were obtainedfor EDV, ESV and EF at rest (r>0-91) and during exercise (r>0-91). The TID method showed only moderate correlations for patients at rest (r>0-86) and during exercise (r>0-79). Similar results as with MMS were achieved by the combined method (MMS+TID) at rest (r>0-91) and during exercise (r>0-91

show abstract

Section: Table 3 Correlation Coefficients (R) and Standard Error Of Tmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of intravenous digital subtraction cineangiocardiography with conventional contrast ventriculography for the determination of the left ventricular volume at rest and during exercise

Birchler

Hess

Murakami

et al. 1985

European Heart Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…11,12 This technique involved the acquisition of fluoroscopic images of the heart before and during contrast injection. Each 1/30 second fluoroscopic image was digitized by an image processing computer (Cardiac 1000, American Edwards Laboratories, Irvine, California) into a 512 by 512 by 8 bit matrix.…”

Section: Digital Angiographic Techniquementioning

confidence: 99%